Strategic supplementation to improve beef cattle performance and expand utilization of pasture-based production systems

dc.contributor.authorAppleyard, Daphne
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeWittenberg, Karin (Animal Science)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeMcGeough, Emma (Animal Science)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeCattani, Doug (Plant Science)
dc.contributor.supervisorOminski, Kimberly
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-11T21:01:08Z
dc.date.available2023-09-11T21:01:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-22
dc.date.submitted2023-08-23T00:47:32Zen_US
dc.date.submitted2023-09-11T03:18:07Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineAnimal Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)
dc.description.abstractThis project was conducted to examine the effects of supplement intake and variation when delivered using a precision feeding system on forage intake and cattle performance when grazing stockpiled perennial forages in early spring and late fall/early winter in Manitoba. In trial 1, 32 Angus-Shorthorn cross steers (391.8 ± 19.5 kg) were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: 1) orchardgrass/alfalfa with supplementation (OA-S; n=8), 2) orchardgrass/alfalfa without supplementation (OA-NS; n=8), 3) tall fescue/alfalfa/cicer milkvetch with supplementation (TAC-S; n=8) and 4) tall fescue/alfalfa/cicer milkvetch without supplementation (TAC-NS; n=8) over a 32-d period in early spring. Supplemented steers were offered 3.2 kg hd-1 d-1 of a grain screening pellet delivered by the SmartFeed Pro system. Forage dry matter intake (DMI) did not differ between treatments (P>0.05), suggesting no substitution of forage for supplement occurred. On average, supplement intake was below targeted allotment (1.7 kg hd-1 d-1), with between- and within-animal coefficient of variation (CV) ranging from 32 to 153%. Although serum urea nitrogen (SUN) concentrations did not differ between treatments, average daily gain (ADG) was significantly greater for OA-S than OA-NS by d 32. In trial 2, 32 Angus-Simmental cross bred heifers (402.5 ± 30.7 kg), selected based on confirmed pregnancy and adaptation to SmartFeed Pro systems, were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) non-supplemented (NS; n=16) and 2) supplemented (S; n=16); with target supplement intake of 2.2 kg hd-1 d-1 for two consecutive 21-d periods in late fall/early winter. Forage DMI did not differ (P>0.05) between NS and S treatments and supplement DMI averaged 2.1 kg hd-1 d-1 with between- and within-animal CV values that were < 35%. Significantly higher ADG and SUN levels were observed for S heifers compared to NS. Further, methane (CH4) emissions did not differ, however S heifers emitted significantly more carbon dioxide (CO2) than NS heifers as a consequence of increased ADG. In summary, these findings suggest that precision feeding systems can effectively deliver supplement on pasture, however, adaptation to the feeders in confinement and day-to-day monitoring of the system is essential to ensure the targeted allotment of supplement is consumed.
dc.description.noteOctober 2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/37637
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectSpring grazing
dc.subjectBeef cattle
dc.subjectSupplementation on pasture
dc.subjectSupplement intake variation
dc.subjectPrecision feeder
dc.subjectSmartFeed Pro
dc.subjectStockpile grazing
dc.subjectStockpiled perennial forage
dc.subjectExtended grazing
dc.titleStrategic supplementation to improve beef cattle performance and expand utilization of pasture-based production systems
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Appleyard_Daphne.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
770 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: