Strategic supplementation to improve beef cattle performance and expand utilization of pasture-based production systems

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2023-08-22
Authors
Appleyard, Daphne
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract

This project was conducted to examine the effects of supplement intake and variation when delivered using a precision feeding system on forage intake and cattle performance when grazing stockpiled perennial forages in early spring and late fall/early winter in Manitoba. In trial 1, 32 Angus-Shorthorn cross steers (391.8 ± 19.5 kg) were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: 1) orchardgrass/alfalfa with supplementation (OA-S; n=8), 2) orchardgrass/alfalfa without supplementation (OA-NS; n=8), 3) tall fescue/alfalfa/cicer milkvetch with supplementation (TAC-S; n=8) and 4) tall fescue/alfalfa/cicer milkvetch without supplementation (TAC-NS; n=8) over a 32-d period in early spring. Supplemented steers were offered 3.2 kg hd-1 d-1 of a grain screening pellet delivered by the SmartFeed Pro system. Forage dry matter intake (DMI) did not differ between treatments (P>0.05), suggesting no substitution of forage for supplement occurred. On average, supplement intake was below targeted allotment (1.7 kg hd-1 d-1), with between- and within-animal coefficient of variation (CV) ranging from 32 to 153%. Although serum urea nitrogen (SUN) concentrations did not differ between treatments, average daily gain (ADG) was significantly greater for OA-S than OA-NS by d 32. In trial 2, 32 Angus-Simmental cross bred heifers (402.5 ± 30.7 kg), selected based on confirmed pregnancy and adaptation to SmartFeed Pro systems, were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) non-supplemented (NS; n=16) and 2) supplemented (S; n=16); with target supplement intake of 2.2 kg hd-1 d-1 for two consecutive 21-d periods in late fall/early winter. Forage DMI did not differ (P>0.05) between NS and S treatments and supplement DMI averaged 2.1 kg hd-1 d-1 with between- and within-animal CV values that were < 35%. Significantly higher ADG and SUN levels were observed for S heifers compared to NS. Further, methane (CH4) emissions did not differ, however S heifers emitted significantly more carbon dioxide (CO2) than NS heifers as a consequence of increased ADG. In summary, these findings suggest that precision feeding systems can effectively deliver supplement on pasture, however, adaptation to the feeders in confinement and day-to-day monitoring of the system is essential to ensure the targeted allotment of supplement is consumed.

Description
Keywords
Spring grazing, Beef cattle, Supplementation on pasture, Supplement intake variation, Precision feeder, SmartFeed Pro, Stockpile grazing, Stockpiled perennial forage, Extended grazing
Citation