MSpace will be unavailable on Sunday Jan 29, 2023 between the times of 8:00AM CST and 12:00PM CST. Please plan your submissions accordingly.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorDurrant, Joan (Family Social Sciences)en_US
dc.contributor.authorMonk, Kendra
dc.description.abstractMale circumcision is one of the most common paediatric surgeries. Most research has concentrated on assessing medical risks versus benefits, yet the majority of infant circumcisions are performed for social reasons. A few studies have surveyed reasons for circumcising/not circumcising. However, they have not revealed the decision-making process. Drawing upon embodiment theories, this study explored expectant parents’ decision-making about circumcision. Interviews were conducted with six individuals. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was utilized to identify themes. Findings revealed eight major themes, including ‘gender jurisdiction’ (whether fathers should have more decision-making power than mothers). Another centred on deciding whose body was the focus – the baby’s or the father’s. All participants perceived bias, both pro- and anti-circumcision, in the information they received from health professionals. They expressed a strong need for objective information and support. The findings may be helpful to obstetricians, paediatricians, and midwives – as well as individuals and families facing this decision.en_US
dc.titleMaking the cut: a phenomenological study of the parental decision-making process for neonatal circumcisionen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US Social Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeRoger, Kerstin (Family Social Sciences) Hinther, Rhonda (Brandon University)en_US of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2014en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record