The effects of human-driven landscape disturbance on wild bee communities and plant-bee networks across southern Manitoba, Canada

dc.contributor.authorHanuschuk, Emily
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeCostamagna, Alejandro (Entomology)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeKoper, Nicola (Natural Resources Institute)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorGibbs, Jason (Entomology)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-10T14:11:02Z
dc.date.available2021-09-10T14:11:02Z
dc.date.copyright2021-08-18
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.date.submitted2021-08-18T15:45:37Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineEntomologyen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractLandscape disturbance caused by human activities like large-scale cropping and urbanization is one of the main drivers of wild bee declines and changes to plant-pollinator networks worldwide. Factors such as land cover diversity and fragmentation can also influence bee communities and networks, but published effects are mixed and often depend on location, community composition, and scale of disturbance. I investigated the effects of local and landscape level disturbance on bee communities and plant-bee networks across southern Manitoba, Canada, with the goal of informing policies aimed at conserving wild bee populations and network functionality. I collected 21,000 bees over two years using coloured pan traps and blue vane traps (for community analyses) and 2,189 using aerial nets (for network analyses). Using linear modelling, I found that crop cover reduced bee abundance and richness, and negatively affected network stability, indicating that greater amounts of crop cover in the landscape have widespread negative effects on both bees and networks. Conversely, fragmentation and land cover diversity benefitted bee abundance, richness, and community functional dispersion in most ecoregions, and enhanced network size and stability. This suggests that areas with greater amounts of edge, as well as a diverse array of land cover types, can benefit bees and networks. Finally, I found that the number of introduced plant species at the local scale enhanced bee community functional dispersion without negative effects on bee abundance or richness, suggesting that introduced plants in field margins help rather than hurt bee communities where native plants have been lost due to disturbance. Extensively removing introduced plant species from field margins should be reconsidered since these species help to support wild bee communities in disturbed areas. Land management policies promoting more extensive field edges and increasing land cover diversity are needed to maintain an abundant and diverse assemblage of bees and to enhance plant-bee network size and stability.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/35952
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectWild beesen_US
dc.subjectPlant-pollinator networksen_US
dc.subjectPollination networksen_US
dc.subjectLandscapeen_US
dc.subjectDisturbanceen_US
dc.subjectFragmentationen_US
dc.subjectLandscape diversityen_US
dc.subjectBeesen_US
dc.titleThe effects of human-driven landscape disturbance on wild bee communities and plant-bee networks across southern Manitoba, Canadaen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hanuschuk_Emily.pdf
Size:
3.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: