Best interests according to whom? How Anishinaabe people impacted by the Manitoba child welfare system define the best interests of the child principle

dc.contributor.authorKowal, Brandy
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeCopenace, Sherry (Social Work Indigenous Knowledge Holder)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeTurnbull, Lorna (Law)
dc.contributor.supervisorDennis, Mary Kate
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T14:41:33Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T14:41:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-21
dc.date.submitted2023-08-21T23:15:44Zen_US
dc.date.submitted2023-09-03T19:15:44Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineSocial Worken_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Social Work (M.S.W.)
dc.description.abstractThis research asked: “how do Anishinaabe people impacted by Manitoba child welfare systems define the best interests of the child principle.” Drawing from an anti-colonial lens and the Breath of Life Theory (Blackstock, 2009; 2011; 2019), and utilizing a conversational methodology (Kovach, 2009; 2019; 2021), eleven self-identified Anishinaabe people were interviewed. Participants ranged in age from 20-63 and included former youth in care, parents, grandparents, and knowledge keepers impacted by child welfare in Manitoba. Analysis was conducted utilizing reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Braun, et al., 2019). Results indicated that the best interests of Anishinaabe children must consider inawendawin (relationship), community, culture, aki (land), gikendaasowin (knowledge, building knowledge), hope and healing. Furthermore, the best interests of Anishinaabe children are inherently connected to their family and community. This research synthesizes the findings into a visual representation and calls for a complete move away from the child and family services system, including challenging the language of child welfare and stepping away from the current models of foster care as part of upholding an Anishinaabe system of caring for family and community. For social work, the research calls for critical learning and reflection in education and practice, and for social workers unwilling to do the work to understand Indigenous worldviews to step away from working with Indigenous people. For settler-colonial governments, the research calls for greater integration of departments, acknowledging that First Nation sovereignty extends beyond child welfare and that the best interest of Anishinaabe children is connected to other departments, such as land.
dc.description.noteOctober 2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/37553
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous child welfare
dc.subjectchild welfare
dc.subjectchild and family services
dc.subjectbest interests
dc.subjectFirst Nation
dc.subjectAnishinaabe
dc.subjectchild welfare law
dc.subjectIndigenous law
dc.subjectBreath of Life Theory
dc.subjectanti-colonial
dc.titleBest interests according to whom? How Anishinaabe people impacted by the Manitoba child welfare system define the best interests of the child principle
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Best Interests According to Whom - B.Kowal.Aug2023.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
770 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: