Statistical models for multilevel data with “Don’t know” category: implication for program evaluation

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Beili
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeShaw, Souradet (Community Health Sciences)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeChen, Jieying (Business Administration)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorJiang, Depeng
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T13:29:52Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T13:29:52Z
dc.date.copyright2023-05-23
dc.date.issued2023-05-23
dc.date.submitted2023-05-19T23:05:39Zen_US
dc.date.submitted2023-05-23T18:28:07Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineCommunity Health Sciencesen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: “Don’t know (DK)” category has been increasingly used in surveys of longitudinal research. This creates unique challenges in data analysis and program evaluation. Strategies applying missing data methods may lead to biased and inaccurate estimations and lose valuable information. Objectives: (i) To illustrate advantages of the proposed two-part mixed effects model over other methods for longitudinal outcomes with DKs through simulation; (ii) to apply the proposed model to a mental health program (Project 11) to evaluate the program effects on participants’ awareness and level of connectedness. Methods: We applied a two-part mixed effects model for longitudinal outcome containing DKs. A simulation study was designed to illustrate the advantages of our proposed model over other methods, where different conditions including sample size, DK proportion, correlation strength between DKs and non-DK responses were considered under different DK mechanisms. We also compared the proposed model with other approaches by applying them to a mental health program (Project 11). In the data analysis of Project 11, we further extended the two-part model to account for within-cluster correlations among students within schools and to explore gender differences in program effects. Results: The proposed two-part mixed effects model outperformed other methods (i.e., CCA, SI, and ML) in estimating both intervention and random effects under all DK mechanisms. In contrast, methods disregarding DKs as missing experienced issues in at least some scenarios. Application of the two-part model to Project 11 data suggested significant intervention effects on improving the connectedness among boys (β ̂_11: -0.071, p = 0.049), whereas no significant improvements were observed among girls. Significant correlations were also found between the likelihood of DKs and connectedness level at both student level and school level. Conclusions: The proposed two-part mixed effects model is highly recommended for analyzing data with DK responses, based on the results of both simulations and empirical data analysis. Missing data techniques should be avoided due to potentially biased and/or imprecise estimates and the loss of information conveyed by DK responses.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/37351
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subject“Don’t know (DK)” responseen_US
dc.subjectTwo-part mixed effects modelen_US
dc.subjectLongitudinal dataen_US
dc.subjectConnectednessen_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectProgram evaluationen_US
dc.titleStatistical models for multilevel data with “Don’t know” category: implication for program evaluationen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
oaire.awardTitleThe VADA Program (Visual and Automated Disease Analytics Graduate Training Program)en_US
project.funder.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038en_US
project.funder.nameNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canadaen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Huang_Beili.pdf
Size:
1.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: