Biodiverse cropping systems in Manitoba: agronomic and economic responses under water-limited conditions

dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Samantha
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeCattani, Douglas (Plant Science)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeSchneider, Kimberley (Soil Science)
dc.contributor.supervisorEntz, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T16:14:22Z
dc.date.available2023-09-05T16:14:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-22
dc.date.submitted2023-08-22T17:00:46Zen_US
dc.date.submitted2023-08-22T17:18:00Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplinePlant Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)
dc.description.abstractAs climates shift and weather patterns become increasingly unpredictable, improving agroecosystem resiliency and stability is imperative to ensure the sustainability of global food production systems. Increasing cropping system biodiversity has been proposed as one solution to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change on Canadian Prairie agriculture. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the productivity, resource use, and economics of no-till crop rotations with varying levels of spatial and temporal diversity. The study examined one base rotation (Conventional Rotation) and four alternative rotations: a High-Risk High-Reward Rotation, a Biodiverse Rotation, a perennial grain rotation (Kernza Rotation), and an Organic Rotation. Diversity was incorporated into the crop rotations using several methods, including intercropping, fall-seeded cover cropping, winter annual grain cropping, perennial grain cropping, and organic cropping with green manures. Individual questions related to crop diversity were also evaluated (e.g., Intercrops versus monocrops). The research took place in Carman, MB during the drought years of 2020 and 2021. The High-Risk High-Reward Rotation was the most economical rotation in this study, while the Biodiverse Rotation was the most environmentally conscious rotation. The Kernza Rotation produced lower values than the Conventional Rotation for yield, harvest index, and water use efficiency. Intercrops produced varying results between years and intercropping types, although the pea/canola intercrop produced greater or similar yields and net returns than sole canola crops without the use of synthetic fertilizers. The fall rye/cover cropping system produced greater yields and dry matter than other annual crops but was overall less economical than most annual crops and mimicked important features of the perennial grain system. Additionally, thanks to weed suppression and soil moisture conservation offered by a terminated hairy vetch/barley mulch, the organic wheat produced significantly similar yields and water use efficiencies as conventional wheat crops while maintaining significantly higher harvest indices and net returns. Overall, this study indicates that increasing crop rotation diversity over time and space can maintain or improve crop productivity, resource use efficiency, yield stability, and economics.
dc.description.noteOctober 2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/37566
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectBiodiverse cropping systems
dc.subjectCrop rotation
dc.subjectNo-till
dc.subjectAgroecology
dc.subjectOrganic agriculture
dc.subjectPerennial grains
dc.subjectIntercropping
dc.subjectCover crops
dc.subjectDrought
dc.titleBiodiverse cropping systems in Manitoba: agronomic and economic responses under water-limited conditions
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Curtis_Samantha.pdf
Size:
2.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
770 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: