In search of Net Positive Carbon Grain Farming in the Northern Great Plains: innovation in policy and practice

dc.contributor.authorRourke, David
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeEntz, Martin (Plant Science)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeHaque, Emdad (Natural Resources Management)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeOrr, Mary-Jane (Natural Resources Management)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeGlenn, Aaron (Natural Resources Management)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeChowdhury, Atahural (University of Guelph)
dc.contributor.supervisorDavidson-Hunt, Iain
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T16:18:18Z
dc.date.available2025-05-20T16:18:18Z
dc.date.issued0025-05-20
dc.date.submitted2025-05-20T14:49:46Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineNatural Resources Institute
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
dc.description.abstractThis thesis addresses the opportunities that exist for grain farms to help mitigate anthropogenic global warming. The thesis developed Rourke’s General Farm Practice Change Theory, then uses that theory to develop a Net Positive Carbon Grain Farming Framework along with a Global Warming Mitigation Credit Framework. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted for sixteen cases involving participants from Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The research is a qualitative exploratory participatory narrative case study. The data was transcribed via UM Zoom and uploaded to NVivo where it was coded and queried for emerging themes. Data was also collected to calculate estimates of emissions, CO2 sequestration, contribution margins, and production output. From this data I was able to determine a Net Positive carbon grain farming score as well as a Sustainable Farm Index rating. During the interview, each participant was asked 10 questions on each of 12 Beneficial Management Practices, BMPs. A 1 to 5 scale was used to record their response and then fed into a tool developed for the study labelled as BERT /E. The BERT/E tool considers the following variables: beliefs (B), economics (E), regulatory (R), technology (T), and the farmer’s physical and mental energy (E) to make a change. BERT/E scores are an indicator of the farmers BMP adoption score. This study yielded both theoretical advancement as well as practical outcomes. The practical outcomes included identifying two participants whose farms are currently Net Positive. This included identifying the BMPs they used to become Net Positive and how their approach differed from the overall group. I was also able to assemble 50 recommendations that would improve the ability of the twelve BMPs to assist farmers in becoming Net Positive. Ultimately, the findings of this work demonstrate that grain farms can be instrumental in tackling anthropogenic global warming.
dc.description.noteOctober 2025
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/39083
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectglobal warming mitigation
dc.subjectRourke's General Farm Practice Change Theory
dc.subjectNet Positive Farm Network
dc.subjectNet Positive Community of Practice
dc.subjectZero Till, No Till
dc.subjectBERT/E
dc.subjectSustainable Farm Index, SFI
dc.subjectNo Regret BMP
dc.subjectNeutral BMP
dc.subjectSacrifice BMP
dc.titleIn search of Net Positive Carbon Grain Farming in the Northern Great Plains: innovation in policy and practice
local.subject.manitobayes
project.funder.nameSelf Funded with senior waiver of tuition fees from UM
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rourke,David.pdf
Size:
4.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
770 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: