Algal primary production in prairie wetlands : the effects of nutrients, irradiance, temperature and aquatic macrophytes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcDougal, Rhonda L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-08T18:57:43Z
dc.date.available2009-12-08T18:57:43Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.degree.disciplineBotanyen_US
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)en_US
dc.description.abstractI studied algal primary production in prairie wetlands, and impacts of anthropogenic nutrient loading, changes in light and temperature, and the presence or absence of macrophytes in the water column. I manipulated nitrogen and phosphorus loading, macrophyte abundance, temperature, and photosynthetically active radiation. My study sites were two Ramsar wetlands, Delta Marsh, an 18,500 ha lacustrine marsh, and Oak Hammock Marsh, a 2,400 ha diked marsh. I hypothesized that algae would contribute significantly to primary production in prairie wetlands, on a scale comparable to or exceeding macrophyte production. The objective in Delta Marsh was to promote a shift from an epiphyton- and submersed macrophyte-dominated marsh (clear water state) to a phytoplankton-dominated turbid state by manipulating macrophyte abundance and inorganic nutrient loading in large enclosures. One objective of my survey of algal and macrophyte abundance in Oak Hammock Marsh was to quantify the contribution of all algal and macrophyte communities to total wetland primary production. Other objectives were to develop a photosynthesis model for each wetland algal assemblage based on photosynthesis-irradiance relationships, and to determine the major limiting resource for algal primary production. I found that algae contribute significantly to primary production in prairie wetlands. In Delta Marsh, algae contributed 34% to standing crop in unmanipulated mesocosms, and 57% to standing crop in nutrient enriched mesocosms. In Oak Hammock Marsh, algae contributed 62% and 68% of total annual primary production in two consecutive years. Phytoplankton responded to nutrient addition, both in the presence of macrophytes and when they were absent. Therefore, the nutrient addition treatments did promote a more turbid state, but the likelihood of a complete switch from clear water to a turbid state in the enclosures was equivocal. This is because periphyton and epiphyton showed a similar magnitude of response to nutrient addition as phytoplankton did, providing an important buffering mechanism within the enclosures by sequestering large amounts of added nutrients. The photosynthesis model, developed from experimentally determined photosynthesis parameters, was able to predict accurate daily productivity estimates when compared with in situ measurements. Light was the single most limiting resource for algae in Oak Hammock Marsh.en_US
dc.format.extent[iv], viii, 290 leaves :en_US
dc.format.extent16000145 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier(Sirsi) AMO-1230en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/3770
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.rightsThe reproduction of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner.en_US
dc.titleAlgal primary production in prairie wetlands : the effects of nutrients, irradiance, temperature and aquatic macrophytesen_US
dc.typedoctoral thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McDougal, Algal primary.pdf
Size:
15.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
Manitoba Heritage Theses