Evidence-based practice for non-specific low back pain: Canadian physiotherapists’ adherence, beliefs, and perspectives

dc.contributor.authordo Prado, Tamires Cristina
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeRipat, Jacquie (Occupational Therapy)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeStrachan, Shaelyn (Kinesiology and Recreation Management)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorParsons, Joanne (Physical Therapy)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-13T17:56:46Z
dc.date.available2019-09-13T17:56:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-24en_US
dc.date.submitted2019-08-24T20:35:22Zen
dc.degree.disciplineCollege of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractIncidence and prevalence of low back pain (LBP) continue to grow in Canada and world- wide; associated psychosocial demands often lead to long-term disability increasing individual and socioeconomic burden. In spite of efforts to develop and update evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBCPGs), a gap remains between research findings and physiotherapists’ practice. Registered Canadian physiotherapists (n=525) completed a cross-sectional online survey including demographic and practice characteristics, a clinical scenario, a questionnaire to assess back pain beliefs (PABS-PT), and a scale to measure self-efficacy in implementing evidence-based practice (EPIC). Treatment choices related to the clinical scenario were scored on a 4-point scale according to recent EBCPGs, and 77.3% of respondents were deemed to have higher adherence (score of 3 or 4) to EBCPGs; however, only 29.5% of respondents chose interventions to directly address psychosocial demands. Physiotherapists with higher adherence to EBCPGs had significantly lower biomedical (mean difference: -3.6, p < 0.001, 95% CI(-5.1, - 2.1)) and significantly higher behavioural (mean difference: 2.6, p < 0.001, 95% CI(1.6, 3.6)) scores on the PABS-PT questionnaire compared to the other group; scores on the EPIC scale were no different between the groups (mean difference: 1.7, p = 0.299, 95% CI(-1.5, 4.8)). A binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of group membership. Physiotherapists’ intention to use EBCPGs, subjective norms regarding use of EBCPGs, biomedical beliefs, and having post-graduate training were significant predictors; the latter being the strongest predictor of higher-adherence. Seven Manitoban physiotherapists were interviewed and reported being highly satisfied with the care they have been providing to patients with LBP even when psychosocial issues are present. Interviewees did not perceive a need for immediate change in their practice but described that it is their responsibility to remain up to date with evidence and identify areas that need improvement. Although overall adherence was high, Canadian physiotherapists do not address psychosocial demands of LBP patients as frequently and do not perceive it as an issue that requires practice changes. Further education and training in EBCPGs and how to address psychosocial demands for physiotherapists in Canada is warranted.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/34260
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based practiceen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectGuidelinesen_US
dc.subjectLow back painen_US
dc.subjectNon-specific low back painen_US
dc.subjectNSLBPen_US
dc.subjectEBPen_US
dc.subjectClinical behaviouren_US
dc.titleEvidence-based practice for non-specific low back pain: Canadian physiotherapists’ adherence, beliefs, and perspectivesen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
do Prado_Tamires.pdf
Size:
4.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: