Landscapes of memory: heritage place and historic sites in prairie Canada

dc.contributor.authorCoutts, Robert
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeChurchill, David (History)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeKuffert, Len (History)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteePeyton, Jonathan (Environment and Geography)en_US
dc.contributor.guestmembersOpp, James (History, Carleton University)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorPerry, Adele (History)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-10T20:25:15Z
dc.date.available2019-01-10T20:25:15Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-18en_US
dc.date.submitted2019-01-10T19:55:52Zen
dc.degree.disciplineHistoryen_US
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: In Landscapes of Memory: Heritage Place and Historic Sites in Prairie Canada I explore concepts of heritage, place, and memory in the prairie west, examining how heritage value is established, how commemoration reflects social and cultural perspectives and how and why interpretation can change over time. I illustrate the process by which the social construction of heritage value can be part of an “authorized” identity that conforms to acceptable, authoritative, and official perceptions of historical significance. My major argument is that “official” historic sites in prairie Canada – and most importantly their interpretation – are examples of authorized spaces that relate to national and nation-building goals. They are frequently examples of an imagined past, or a heritage defined by modern perceptions often with landscapes that become fashioned as aestheticized space or pleasing landscapes that have become idealized to fit with visitor expectations. I also argue that local political and cultural forces have come to influence the way historic place is understood. I suggest that it is the tension between federal goals and the aims of the local that have resulted in changing and evolving interpretations. This study looks at how our view of the past constructs the heritage of place and community that relate the past to the present. I focus upon how the significance of place is often contested and how, for instance, Indigenous perceptions often challenge conventional views of the past. I discuss the process of commemoration of some critical twentieth century themes in prairie history while referencing examples of recognized heritage places in Western Canada, including cultural topographies, Indigenous landscapes, community-recognized built heritage, and national historic sites in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. More broadly, I look at questions such as who decides what is heritage, who claims authority and why, and how are perceptions of place memory effectively reproduced.en_US
dc.description.noteFebruary 2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/33699
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectHeritage placeen_US
dc.subjectHistoric sitesen_US
dc.subjectPrairie canadaen_US
dc.titleLandscapes of memory: heritage place and historic sites in prairie Canadaen_US
dc.typedoctoral thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Landscapes of Memory (January 10) compressed.pdf
Size:
5.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: