Protected area planning and management in the Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh, India: a case study of environmental justice and learning for biodiversity conservation

dc.contributor.authorDilay, Ariane
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeDiduck, Alan (Natural Resources Institute)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeGardner, James (Natural Resources Institute)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorSinclair, John (Natural Resources Institute)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-20T21:08:23Z
dc.date.available2021-01-20T21:08:23Z
dc.date.copyright2021-01-18
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.date.submitted2020-08-25T15:00:42Zen_US
dc.date.submitted2020-12-22T02:30:12Zen_US
dc.date.submitted2021-01-18T15:06:43Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineNatural Resources Instituteen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Natural Resources Management (M.N.R.M.)en_US
dc.description.abstractWhile Protected Areas (PAs) are essential for the preservation of biodiversity, conservation efforts should not impose injustices onto local communities. Using a qualitative case study that included document review, semi-structured interviews, participant observation and thematic analysis, the planning and management of a network of PAs in the Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh, India were examined. The study 1) describes the planning and management approach for PAs in Kullu, 2) explains how the planning and management approach has changed since the declaration of the first national park in 1984, 3) evaluates the integration of the four attributes of environmental justice (distributive, procedural, recognitional and restorative) in PA planning and management, and 4) identifies learning outcomes for those involved in or affected by PAs in the Kullu District and relates such outcomes to environmental justice. Overall, the data reveal that the planning and management of PAs in Kullu operates under an Exclusive Model that restricts local people from accessing and utilizing natural resources within PAs, while also excluding them from participating in planning and management activities. In terms of environmental justice, the data show that there is an uneven distribution of benefits from PAs and inequitable restrictions on resource use, a lack of early and ongoing consultation with locally affected communities, and uneven and inadequate compensation for loss of traditional rights. One important learning outcome identified by forest officers is a movement away from the practice of forced displacement of people. Although this suggests a transition toward a more inclusive model, much work remains to advance environmental justice in PA planning and management in the Kullu District. The data also indicate that inclusivity and advancement of environmental justice in PA planning and management could be achieved through: collaborative knowledge exchange between forest officers and community members; opportunities for community members to participate in planning and management activities; and the recognition of marginalized members of society in PA planning.en_US
dc.description.noteFebruary 2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/35286
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectProtected areaen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental justiceen_US
dc.subjectLearningen_US
dc.subjectNREMen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversity conservationen_US
dc.titleProtected area planning and management in the Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh, India: a case study of environmental justice and learning for biodiversity conservationen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dilay_Ariane.pdf
Size:
3.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: