Mobilizing agri-food movements: Roles of alternative agri-food systems in addressing the rural crisis in South Korea
| dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Soon-Won | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Thompson, Shirley (Natural Resources Institute) Desmarais, Annette (Environment & Geography) Scott, Steffanie (Geography & Environmental Management, University of Waterloo) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | McLachlan, Stephane (Environment & Geography) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-19T18:47:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-19T18:47:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.degree.discipline | Environment and Geography | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Over the past decade, concerns regarding food safety and access to and control over food have become widespread in South Korea and are often associated with concerns over the global agri-food system. Large consumer cooperatives that have memberships that can exceed 800,000 members have emerged as a popular and effective way of addressing these concerns. Yet, these important alternatives to the global agri-food system have received little attention by researchers and policymakers alike. This study investigated attitudes towards an ongoing agricultural and rural crisis and food concerns for consumers and farmers in South Korea. Further, the roles of consumer cooperatives in addressing this crisis and as an alternative to the global food system were documented. Surveys were conducted with 412 conventional consumers and 452 consumers that were members of consumer cooperatives as well as 166 conventional farmers, and 118 farmers that grow food for these cooperatives. In addition, 11 Korean food experts that reflect a wide diversity of stakeholder interests including government, NGO, universities and farmers were also interviewed. Korean consumers identified that freshness was the most important factor when they purchase foods, followed by food safety and price. It seemed that the global agri-food system is unlikely to address these consumer concerns. Public rallies that raised concerns about the import of beef from the US reflected widespread public resistance to agricultural globalization and the pursuit of economic liberalization by the Korean government. Participants perceived that government policies neglected domestic agriculture and were the primary cause of low rate of food self-sufficiency in Korea. Both conventional farmers and member farmers strongly opposed policies that promote industrial economic growth at the expense of local farmers and food systems. Farmers in this study were generally highly critical of the global agri-food system, especially those that were relatively young and well educated. Member farmers benefitted from their relationships with consumer cooperatives, and earned an 11-30% premium compared to farmers that sell their products to large retail markets. Korean consumer cooperatives represent an important frame for building alternative food systems and for promoting cooperation between consumers and farmers into the future. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | February 2016 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/31104 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Alternative food systems, Agricultural globalization, Consumer cooperatives, Consumer and farmer perception, South Korea | en_US |
| dc.title | Mobilizing agri-food movements: Roles of alternative agri-food systems in addressing the rural crisis in South Korea | en_US |
| dc.type | doctoral thesis | en_US |
| local.subject.manitoba | yes | en_US |