Forage quality, animal performance and behaviour of bred beef heifers grazing stockpiled perennial and annual forages in the late fall/early winter in Manitoba

dc.contributor.authorDickson, Jordan
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeWittenberg, Karin (Animal Science)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeCattani, Doug (Plant Science)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorOminski, Kim (Animal Science) McGeough, Emma (Animal Science)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T04:12:50Z
dc.date.available2022-02-23T04:12:50Z
dc.date.copyright2022-02-10
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.date.submitted2022-02-10T17:38:36Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineAnimal Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractStockpile grazing is practiced to extend the grazing season of beef cows in western Canada. Little research has been conducted to identify plant species for successful stockpile grazing of bred beef heifers during the late fall/early winter. Objectives of this study were to compare the three stockpiled perennial and one annual forage stand based on: 1) forage quality, yield and plant height, 2) performance (weight gain, serum urea nitrogen, intake and methane output) of bred beef heifers, 3) animal activity (distance traveled and time spent at shelter/water). Four stockpiled forage treatments were grazed for two, 28-d periods near Brandon, Manitoba, Canada. Treatments included: 1) Courtney tall fescue (T)/Fleet meadow bromegrass (M)/Yellowhead alfalfa (A; TAM), 2) Killarney orchardgrass (OG)/Algonquin alfalfa (A; OGA), 3) Courtney tall fescue/Algonquin alfalfa/Oxley II cicer milkvetch (C; TAC) and 4) Fusion corn (COR) in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 4 heifers/replicate/treatment. Forage biomass yield in performance pastures of COR (6,342 kg DM ha-1) was 68%, 79% and 57% higher (P=0.011) than OGA, TAC, and TAM, respectively, which did not differ from each other. Crude protein was highest in TAC (10.29% and 10.90%) and COR was the lowest (6.87% and 6.76%). However, COR had the highest in TDN (72.14% and 71.90%) when compared to perennial forage treatments. All heifers gained weight in Period 1 (1.36 kg d-1) suggesting that all treatments could be successfully stockpile grazed in the late fall. When temperature fell to <-18°C Period 2 (-2 kg d-1), all heifers lost weight and those grazing perennial pastures spent more time (30-54% of the day) near windbreak shelters. Heifers grazing COR spent 7% of the day near shelter, suggesting COR provided adequate shelter. TAC was identified as the superior perennial forage treatment for stockpile grazing, based on higher CP and lower NDF compared to OGA and TAM, as well as improved ADG compared to OGA and numerically higher ADG compared to TAM, Although COR had increased yield and TDN with lower CP compared to TAC, ADG was comparable between the two treatments. Nonetheless, significant weight loss in Period 2 indicated that all treatments required supplementation.en_US
dc.description.noteMarch 2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/36316
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectStockpile grazingen_US
dc.subjectExtended grazingen_US
dc.subjectBeef heifersen_US
dc.subjectStockpile forageen_US
dc.subjectforageen_US
dc.subjectAnimal behaviouren_US
dc.subjectWinter grazingen_US
dc.subjectFall grazingen_US
dc.titleForage quality, animal performance and behaviour of bred beef heifers grazing stockpiled perennial and annual forages in the late fall/early winter in Manitobaen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dickson_jordan.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: