Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ikonomov, Daniel Ivanov en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-07-12T17:49:41Z
dc.date.available 2007-07-12T17:49:41Z
dc.date.issued 2001-10-01T00:00:00Z en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2579
dc.description.abstract The stated purpose of 'Bill C-41' was to provide courts with more options in an effort to distinguish serious from less serious offences and offenders through the imposition of expanded range of sentencing alternatives. A major step in that direction was the introduction of a new type of sanction, the conditional sentence of imprisonment. In a series of recent decisions the Supreme Court of Canada addressed certain contentious issues surrounding the new sentencing regime. While conditional sentencing was readily embraced by the courts as an alternative to imprisonment, the need to fill the legislative gap in the use of non-custodial sanctions remains. One way to advance Parliament's intent is to develop a system of non-custodial intermediate sanctions, that is sanctions beyond conditional discharge, ordinary probation or small fines, but short of imprisonment. A system of intermediate sanctions is proposed, based on rough equivalencies among sanctions, with reference to a set of detailed sentencing guidelines. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) en_US
dc.format.extent 6340106 bytes
dc.format.extent 184 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.language en en_US
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title Conditional sentencing and the need for a principled system of non-custodial sanctions en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.degree.discipline Law en_US
dc.degree.level Master of Laws (LL.M.) en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics