Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wright, Lisa Marie en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-06-01T19:18:32Z
dc.date.available 2007-06-01T19:18:32Z
dc.date.issued 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2250
dc.description.abstract The stimulus estimation model (Taylor and Rachman, 1994) asserts that fear overprediction stems from: (a) overprediction of the danger elements of a phobic stimulus, and (b) underprediction of existing safety resources. Using a 2 x 2 factorial design, with danger (high vs. low) and safety (high vs. low) as between-subjects variables, an experimental test of the model was conducted with 25 snake-fearful participants per condition. The four experimental conditions were matched on initial levels of snake fearfulness, as assessed by the Snake Questionnaire (SNAQ). For the 51 participants who demonstrated overprediction of fear, high danger led to reliably more fear overprediction than low danger; and low safety led to reliably more fear overprediction than high safety. The interaction between danger and safety was not statistically significant. The results offer the first convincing experimental support for the stimulus estimation model of fear overprediction. en_US
dc.format.extent 2500735 bytes
dc.format.extent 184 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.language en en_US
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.title An experimental test of stimulus estimation theory, danger and safety with snake phobic stimuli en_US
dc.degree.discipline Psychology en_US
dc.degree.level Master of Arts (M.A.) en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics