Evaluation of Asthma Control by Physicians and Patients: Comparison with Current Guidelines

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBoulet, Louis-Philippe
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Robert
dc.contributor.authorO’Byrne, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Allan
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-08T20:18:09Z
dc.date.available2016-06-08T20:18:09Z
dc.date.issued2002-1-1
dc.date.updated2016-06-07T07:00:54Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:Current asthma consensus guidelines recommend a series of criteria for determining whether asthma is controlled. It is not known whether physicians are using these criteria to assess treatment needs and how effective such assessments are compared with patient assessment of asthma control.OBJECTIVE: To compare the parameters used by physicians and patients with asthma to determine whether asthma control is acceptable, according to the current Canadian asthma consensus guidelines.DATA AND METHODS: A total of 183 Canadian physicians, mostly general practitioners, evaluated 856 patients with mildly to moderately uncontrolled asthma who were not using anti-inflammatory medications at the time of entry in the study. Physician characteristics and patient demographics were obtained. The physicians completed two questionnaires, one assessing the level of asthma control of the patient on an ordinal scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) and another indicating the parameters that were used to evaluate this level of control. Patients answered an asthma control questionnaire identical to the one completed by the physician and completed a six-question asthma control questionnaire, with each question scored on a 0- to 6-point scale.RESULTS: Although according to current asthma guidelines all patients surveyed had uncontrolled asthma, 66.2% of patients and 43.3% of physicians rated control of asthma symptoms as adequate to very good. The average scores for patient- and physician-rated asthma control were 3.0±0.2 and 2.6±0.2, respectively. The average patient score on the Juniper asthma questionnaire was 12.2±6.3. Physicians used a mean of seven parameters to assess the patient’s level of asthma control, mostly beta2-agonist need, followed by cough, wheezing, shortness of breath, limitation of physical activities and night-time awakenings. Pediatricians used cough more frequently as an evaluation parameter, and respirologists measured pulmonary function more often than other physcians. Some parameters not usually included in guideline criteria for control, such as fatigue, need to clear throat, colored sputum, headache and dizziness, were sometimes used by physicians. Only 10% and 18% of physicians used measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow, respectively, in asthma control assessments.CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the selection of asthma control criteria among physicians varies and is not always in keeping with current asthma guidelines. Both patients and physicians often consider asthma to be controlled, when according to current guidelines, it is not, and patients consider their asthma better controlled than do physicians. Objective measures of airflow obstruction are rarely used to assess asthma control. The present study stresses the need for improved dissemination - to both patients and physicians - of current recommendations on how asthma control should be determined.
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.identifier.citationLouis-Philippe Boulet, Robert Phillips, Paul O’Byrne, and Allan Becker, “Evaluation of Asthma Control by Physicians and Patients: Comparison with Current Guidelines,” Canadian Respiratory Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 417-423, 2002. doi:10.1155/2002/731804
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/731804
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/31433
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2002 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.titleEvaluation of Asthma Control by Physicians and Patients: Comparison with Current Guidelines
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CRJ.2002.731804.xml
Size:
8.85 KB
Format:
Extensible Markup Language
Description:
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CRJ.2002.731804.pdf
Size:
242.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.24 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
University of Manitoba Scholarship
Rady Faculty of Health Sciences Scholarly Works