Corticospinal and spinal excitability during progressive skin and core cooling

dc.contributor.authorTalebian nia, Morteza
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeGlazebrook, Cheryl (Kinesiology and Recreation Management)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeChopek, Jeremy (Physiology and Pathophysiology)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorGiesbrecht, Gordon
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T17:44:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-12T17:44:33Z
dc.date.copyright2022-08-11
dc.date.issued2022-08-11
dc.date.submitted2022-08-11T15:17:01Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineKinesiology and Recreation Managementen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractCold stress in survival situations can impair fine and gross motor control. This reduces muscle control and performance which can lead to life threatening consequences. Effect of cooling on muscle performance is mostly on the muscle tissue and local. However, less is known about its effect on the central nervous system. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize corticospinal and spinal excitability that occurs during whole-body cooling, resulting in a reduction in both skin (Tsk) and core (Tco) temperature and shivering. Eight subjects (four male, four female) wore a liquid perfused suit and cooled by 2°C water pumped into the suit for 90 minutes and rewarmed with 41°C water for 30 minutes. Meanwhile, stimulation blocks consisting of 10 transcranial magnetic stimulations (eliciting MEPs), 8 trans-mastoid (eliciting CMEPs) and 2 brachial plexus (eliciting Mmax) electrical stimulations, were delivered at baseline, and 30, 60, and 90 minutes of cooling and once after 30 minutes of rewarming. 90 min cooling reduced Tsk to 18.2 ± 1.1°C (P <0.001) while Tco did not change (P = 0.92). Shivering EMG of all eight subjects was observed and recorded. At 100 min, met heat production was significantly higher than baseline (P = 0.013). Shivering stopped after 15 min of the start of the rewarming all subjects stopped shivering. Regardless of cooling or rewarming, Mmax, MEP, and MEP/Mmax did not change from baseline, but CMEP and CMEP/Mmax increased at the end of rewarming by 64% (P = 0.001) and (58%) (P = 0.02) respectively. These results suggest that a reduced Tco increases spinal excitability. However, corticospinal excitability remained unaltered.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/36680
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectMotor Evoked Potential (MEP)en_US
dc.subjectCervicomedullary Evoked Potential (CMEP)en_US
dc.subjectTrans-mastoid Electrical Stimulation (TMES)en_US
dc.subjectMmaxen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)en_US
dc.titleCorticospinal and spinal excitability during progressive skin and core coolingen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobanoen_US
oaire.awardNumber5017978en_US
oaire.awardTitleNeuromuscular mechanisms for cold-induced changes in voluntary and involuntary muscle activityen_US
project.funder.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038en_US
project.funder.nameNSERC Canadaen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Talebian nia_Moteza.pdf
Size:
1.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: