Development of a patients’ satisfaction analysis system using machine learning and lexicon-based methods

dc.contributor.authorKhaleghparast, Shiva
dc.contributor.authorMaleki, Majid
dc.contributor.authorHajianfar, Ghasem
dc.contributor.authorSoumari, Esmaeil
dc.contributor.authorOveisi, Mehrdad
dc.contributor.authorGolandouz, Hassan M.
dc.contributor.authorNoohi, Feridoun
dc.contributor.authordehaki, Maziar G.
dc.contributor.authorGolpira, Reza
dc.contributor.authorMazloomzadeh, Saeideh
dc.contributor.authorArabian, Maedeh
dc.contributor.authorKalayinia, Samira
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T15:58:53Z
dc.date.available2023-05-01T15:58:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-23
dc.date.updated2023-04-04T17:42:23Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Patients’ rights are integral to medical ethics. This study aimed to perform sentiment analysis and opinion mining on patients’ messages by a combination of lexicon-based and machine learning methods to identify positive or negative comments and to determine the different ward and staff names mentioned in patients’ messages. Methods The level of satisfaction and observance of the rights of 250 service recipients of the hospital was evaluated through the related checklists by the evaluator. In total, 822 Persian messages, composed of 540 negative and 282 positive comments, were collected and labeled by the evaluator. Pre-processing was performed on the messages and followed by 2 feature vectors which were extracted from the messages, including the term frequency–inverse document frequency (TFIDF) vector and a combination of the multifeature (MF) (a lexicon-based method) and TFIDF (MF + TFIDF) vectors. Six feature selectors and 5 classifiers were used in this study. For the evaluations, 5-fold cross-validation with different metrics including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), F1 score, sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE) and Precision-Recall Curves (PRC) were reported. Message tag detection, which featured different hospital wards and identified staff names mentioned in the study patients’ messages, was implemented by the lexicon-based method. Results The best classifier was Multinomial Naïve Bayes in combination with MF + TFIDF feature vector and SelectFromModel (SFM) feature selection (ACC = 0.89 ± 0.03, AUC = 0.87 ± 0.03, F1 = 0.92 ± 0.03, SEN = 0.93 ± 0.04, and SPE = 0.82 ± 0.02, PRC-AUC = 0.97). Two methods of assessment by the evaluator and artificial intelligence as well as survey systems were compared. Conclusion Our results demonstrated that the lexicon-based method, in combination with machine learning classifiers, could extract sentiments in patients’ comments and classify them into positive and negative categories. We also developed an online survey system to analyze patients’ satisfaction in different wards and to remove conventional assessments by the evaluator.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):280
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):280
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09260-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/37323
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)en_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleDevelopment of a patients’ satisfaction analysis system using machine learning and lexicon-based methodsen_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
local.author.affiliationRady Faculty of Health Sciences::Max Rady College of Medicine::Department of Community Health Sciencesen_US
oaire.citation.issue1en_US
oaire.citation.startPage280en_US
oaire.citation.titleBMC Health Services Researchen_US
oaire.citation.volume23en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12913_2023_Article_9260.pdf
Size:
8.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.24 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: