Improvement of 3D printing quality for fabricating soft scaffolds
| dc.contributor.author | Weibin, Lin | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Xing, Malcolm (Mechanical Engineering) Pourang, Irani (Computer Science) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Peng, Qingjin (Mechanical Engineering) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-27T17:51:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-02-27T17:51:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-08-20 | en_US |
| dc.degree.discipline | Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Science (M.Sc.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Tissue engineering (TE) integrates methods of cells, engineering and materials to improve or replace biological functions of native tissues or organs. 3D printing technologies have been used in TE to produce different kinds of tissues. Based on review of the exiting 3D printing technologies used in TE, special requirements of fabricating soft scaffolds are identified. Soft scaffolds provide a microenvironment with biocompatibility for living cells proliferation. This research focuses on 3D printer design and printing parameters investigation for fabrication of soft scaffolds. A 3D printer is proposed for producing artificial soft scaffolds, with components of a pneumatic dispenser, a temperature controller and a multi-nozzle changing system. Relations of 3D printing parameters are investigated to improve the printing quality of soft scaffolds. It provides guidance for printing customized bio-materials with improved efficiency and quality. In the research, printing parameters are identified and classified based on existing research solutions. A deposition model is established to analyze the parameters relations. Quantitative criteria of parameters are proposed to evaluate the printing quality. A series of experiments including factors experiments and comparison tests are conducted to find effects of parameters and their interactions. A case study is conducted to verify the analytic solution of proposed models. This research confirms that the hydrogel concentration and nozzle diameters have significant effects on the filament diameter. Factor interactions are mainly embodied in between the concentration of hydrogel solutions and dispensing pressures. Besides filament diameters, the nozzle height and space also affect the printing accuracy significantly. An appropriate nozzle height is considered to be 1.4 times than the nozzle diameter, and a reasonable nozzle space is suggested from 2.0 to 2.5 times of the nozzle diameter. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | May 2015 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Lin, W., & Peng, Q. (2014, August). 3D Printing Technologies for Tissue Engineering. In ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. V004T06A002-V004T06A002). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/30281 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | ASME | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Tissue engineering | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hydrogel scaffold | en_US |
| dc.subject | 3D printing | en_US |
| dc.title | Improvement of 3D printing quality for fabricating soft scaffolds | en_US |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |