Eye-hand coordination: memory-guided grasping in a cluttered environment

dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Hana H
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeIvanco, Tammy (Psychology)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeSzturm, Tony (College of Rehabilitation Sciences)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorMarotta, Jonathan (Psychology)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T15:16:25Z
dc.date.available2019-09-11T15:16:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-27en_US
dc.date.submitted2019-07-19T18:10:04Zen
dc.date.submitted2019-09-11T15:10:45Zen
dc.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts (M.A.)en_US
dc.description.abstractWe often reach for remembered objects, such as when picking up a coffee cup from behind our laptop. In cases like this, we rely on visuospatial memory, encoded by the perceptual mechanisms of the ventral visual stream, to guide our actions, rather than on the real-time control of action by the dorsal visual stream (Milner & Goodale, 1995). Further, our motor plans must often accommodate for the messy spaces within which we act, avoiding irrelevant objects in our way. Little research has examined obstacle avoidance during memory-guided grasping, though it is likely obstacles perceived by the ventral stream as more salient will produce exacerbated avoidance maneuvers. This study examined how the availability of visual feedback altered eye-hand coordination in an obstacle avoidance paradigm. Eye and hand movements were monitored as subjects had to reach through a pair of obstacles in order to grasp a 3-D target object, under full visual feedback (visually-guided), immediately in the absence of visual feedback (memory-guided no-delay), or after a 2-s delay in the absence of visual feedback (memory-guided delay). Positions and widths of obstacles were manipulated, though their inner edges remained a constant distance apart. We expected the memory-guided delay group to exhibit exaggerated avoidance strategies due to a reliance on the perceptual mechanisms of the ventral steam. Results revealed successful obstacle avoidance and grasps of the target object in all groups, however different avoidance strategies emerged depending on the availability of visual feedback. The visually-guided and memory-guided no-delay groups used real-time visual information to alter the paths of the index finger and wrist and adjust final index finger positions on the target object, to account for positioned obstacles. Still, the no-delay group showed wider index finger paths and a failure to adjust final fixations, resulting from the inability to use visual information for the online control of action. Unexpectedly, the memory-guided delay group employed a rather moderate strategy for avoiding obstacles, in that positioned obstacles less often prompted alterations in the mechanics of the reach. In conclusion, obstacle avoidance when reaching to remembered objects adopts a more moderate, rather than exaggerative, strategy.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/34206
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectVisionen_US
dc.subjectGraspingen_US
dc.subjectObstacle avoidanceen_US
dc.subjectVisuomotor controlen_US
dc.subjectEye-hand coordinationen_US
dc.subjectDelayed reachingen_US
dc.titleEye-hand coordination: memory-guided grasping in a cluttered environmenten_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abbas_Hana.pdf
Size:
4.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: