We are all downstream: Teaching middle years science from a sustainability perspective
| dc.contributor.author | Freedman Tetrault, Amanda | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Lewthwaite, Brian (Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning) McDonald, Christina (Manitoba Education, Citizenship, and Youth) | en |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Robinson, Gordon (Biological Sciences & Education) | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-04-14T17:22:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2008-04-14T17:22:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-04-14T17:22:58Z | |
| dc.degree.discipline | Curriculum, Teaching and Learning | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Education (M.Ed.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The 21st century has emerged with Canadians experiencing great concern about how we do things in the world. The degrading environment preys greatly on the minds of Canadians while our actions may not match our thoughts. How do we educate our students as future leaders about sustainability and help them understand that our individual actions make a difference? The intent of this study was to make a difference in students’ and teachers’ lives. It needed to be determined if teachers felt that there was a gap in the current way that we are teaching about sustainability. The results of a Manitoba teacher survey and a literature review identified several different risk and protective factors: those that either constrain or support the teaching of sustainability in a science classroom. The three risks that were discovered to be the strongest were preparation time, availability of resources and that sustainability issues are often highly complex. These concerns became the foundation for informing the implementation phase of this study. From this information a resource that met all of the specific learning outcomes (SLOs) as mandated by Manitoba Education, Citizenship, and Youth (MECY) for the grade 8 Water Systems cluster was designed and piloted. Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological theory (1979) and The Natural Step’s Four Systems Conditions were used as a foundation. There was a significant difference between the pilot groups and the control groups in three of the four areas tested. Teachers reported enjoying using the resource, and finding it helpful. They also reported that their students were engaged by the use of the resource. The thesis summation suggests how the resource might be shared and improved upon with and by teachers around the province and beyond, and hope that it provides a framework for future lessons or units related to sustainability. | en |
| dc.description.note | May 2008 | en |
| dc.format.extent | 3701250 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3027 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | sustainability | en |
| dc.subject | science | en |
| dc.subject | middle years | en |
| dc.title | We are all downstream: Teaching middle years science from a sustainability perspective | en |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |