“I am not a mindreader:” dyadic effects of expected mindreading and understanding on romantic relationship quality

dc.contributor.authorMacLean Legge, Justine E.
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeAlbas, Daniel (Sociology)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeVorauer, Jacquie (Psychology)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeHiebert-Murphy, Diane (Psychology)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeCobb, Rebecca (Simon Fraser University)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorCameron, Jessica J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-26T16:47:57Z
dc.date.available2022-08-26T16:47:57Z
dc.date.copyright2022-08-25
dc.date.issued2022-08-25
dc.date.submitted2022-08-26T00:47:32Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)en_US
dc.description.abstractExpected mindreading is the belief that romantic relationship partners should know each other’s needs and feelings without having to communicate them and is tied to poorer communication, greater conflict, and lower relational satisfaction. Despite associations with important interpersonal variables, no prior research has undertaken a dyadic approach to examine associations between expected mindreading and relationship quality. Given the interdependent nature of relationships, it is crucial to consider the influence of both partners. In the present cross-sectional online questionnaire study, 142 couples and 222 unpaired individuals in romantic relationships completed measures of expected mindreading, felt understanding, felt transparency, actual transparency, and relationship quality. I hypothesized that individuals higher in expected mindreading and their partners would report lower relationship quality (i.e., actor and partner effects) and that higher combined couple expected mindreading scores would be tied to lower relationship quality (i.e., shared vulnerability effect). I also predicted that felt understanding, felt transparency, actual transparency, and relationship improvement strategies would moderate the association between expected mindreading and relationship quality. As predicted, results of the couple sample Actor-Partner Interdependence Model revealed actor, partner, and shared vulnerability effects, with greater individual- and couple-level endorsement of expected mindreading tied to lower relationship quality for individuals and their partner. Supporting my prediction, felt understanding moderated the association between expected mindreading and relationship quality. For those higher in expected mindreading, relationship quality was somewhat protected from their dysfunctional belief when felt understanding was higher compared to lower. Contrary to my hypotheses, neither felt nor actual transparency moderated the association between expected mindreading and relationship quality. Results of the unpaired sample revealed an actor effect, with a moderate negative association between expected mindreading and relationship quality, but no significant interactions between expected mindreading and felt transparency, felt understanding, or relationship improvement strategies emerged. Findings underline the importance of considering dyadic effects and felt understanding in both research and clinical realms. The results suggest key implications for our understanding of expected mindreading and romantic relationship dynamics, as well as provide insight into treatment approaches to bolster relationship quality for those higher in this dysfunctional belief.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2022en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba Canadian Psychological Association Student Sectionen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/36776
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectromanticen_US
dc.subjectrelationshipsen_US
dc.subjectbeliefsen_US
dc.subjectmindreadingen_US
dc.subjectunderstandingen_US
dc.subjectexpectationsen_US
dc.title“I am not a mindreader:” dyadic effects of expected mindreading and understanding on romantic relationship qualityen_US
dc.typedoctoral thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobanoen_US
oaire.awardNumber752-2020-1789en_US
oaire.awardTitleDoctoral fellowshipen_US
project.funder.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000155en_US
project.funder.nameSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canadaen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MacLeanLegge_Justine.pdf
Size:
962.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: