Assessing in vitro methodologies for the determination of protein digestibility, amino acid digestibility, and protein quality

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBui, Nguyen
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeAluko, Rotimi (Food and Human Nutritional Sciences)
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeNyachoti, Martin (Animal Science)
dc.contributor.supervisorJames, House
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T20:03:05Z
dc.date.available2024-07-09T20:03:05Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-24
dc.date.submitted2024-06-24T16:41:45Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineFood and Human Nutritional Sciences
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the potential of two in vitro static digestion models, namely the pH-drop and INFOGEST 2.0, to determine in vitro protein digestibility and amino acid digestibility in assessing protein quality. The pH-drop model directly measured in vitro protein digestibility for the subsequent calculation of the in vitro Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (IV-PDCAAS) value. However, the INFOGEST model digestion products were analyzed by three methods: i) OPA derivatization, ii) total nitrogen via Kjeldahl, and iii) individual amino acid analysis to determine in vitro protein digestibility and IV-PDCAAS. The latter analysis was additionally used to assess in vitro amino acid digestibility, subsequently used to calculate in vitro Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (IV-DIAAS). Among the four assessment methods, the OPA assay and total amino acid analysis from the INFOGEST digestion products demonstrated closer associations with in vivo PDCAAS compared to the pH-drop model and the Kjeldahl analysis. However, the pH-drop model, with a straightforward and simple approach, exhibited better repeatability across measurements. Using three popular assays, the PDCAAS, the DIAAS, and the Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER), to evaluate protein quality and permitted protein content claims of samples, it was observed that there was no difference in terms of protein content claims determined when using the in vivo or four in vitro methodologies. The results indicated that the PDCAAS generally offered higher protein permitted claims than the DIAAS and the PER methods and their respective protein content claims, highlighting that the selection of assessment methods impacts the limiting amino acid and protein quality and extends to subsequent claims for the sample. In conclusion, the pH-drop model is straightforward and highly repeatable; however, the INFOGEST model showed a closer correlation with in vivo data. Additionally, the in vitro static INFOGEST digesta proved versatile in evaluating various aspects of protein quality in both in vitro protein and amino acid digestibility through amino acid analysis. Both models can be valuable screening tools for protein quality assessment. Further development of these in vitro methodologies can offer effective and sustainable non-animal testing alternatives for protein quality assessment and protein content claims on product packaging.
dc.description.noteOctober 2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/38313
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectIn vitro digestion model
dc.subjectpH-drop
dc.subjectINFOGEST
dc.subjectprotein quality
dc.subjectPDCAAS
dc.subjectDIAAS
dc.subjectPER
dc.subjectprotein digestibility
dc.subjectamino acid digestibility
dc.titleAssessing in vitro methodologies for the determination of protein digestibility, amino acid digestibility, and protein quality
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobano
project.funder.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038
project.funder.nameNSERC
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessing in vitro methodologies for the determination of protein digestibility, amino acid digestibility, and protein quality
Size:
3.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
I would like to request an embargo on this master's thesis due to the sensitivity of the samples used. Some of these samples are unique products on the market. Ensuring the confidentiality of this information is crucial to avoid conflicts of interest and protect our partners' commercial interests.
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
770 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica