Reviving the vanishing subject: the subject as abject in postmodern memoir
dc.contributor.author | Rich, Susan | |
dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Brydon, Diana (English, Film, and Theatre) Renée, Louise (French, Spanish and Italian) Moss, Laura (University of British Columbia) | en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Cariou, Warren (English, Film, and Theatre) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-07T14:16:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-07T14:16:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.degree.discipline | English, Film and Theatre | en_US |
dc.degree.level | Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | My dissertation contemplates rhetorical and ontological problems of self-representation in twentieth century postmodern memoir. Many postmodernists contend the self merely deteriorates amid the fallibility of memory, instabilities of ‘truth’, a Lacanian notion of language as inexpressible of the self, and a subjectivity so multiplicitous and constructed that it is impossible to write. Yet Julia Kristeva’s psychoanalytic notion of abjection – a dialectical process that simultaneously dismantles and reinforces the self – illuminates postmodern autobiographical subjectivity as ultimately revived through literary self-alienation. As such a process of abjection, postmodern autobiography thus involves reconstruction amid deconstruction – wherein a “weight of meaninglessness . . . crushes me” (Kristeva Powers 2) while also ensuring “that ‘I’ does not disappear in it but finds, in . . . sublime alienation, a forfeited existence” (Kristeva Powers 9). This approach resituates the genre as an ethical form of heteroglossic self-renewal, wherein the recognition of self-as-other facilitates an ethical engagement with community in an increasingly pluralistic world. Postmodern autobiography is thus revealed as a relevant, productive space of renewal despite its own claims of futility. I focus on five exemplars of postmodern autobiography – texts written by Lucy Grealy, Suniti Namjoshi, Vladimir Nabokov, Robert Kroetsch, and Michael Ondaatje – to demonstrate how a view of postmodern autobiography as abject translates across such diverse social constructs as nation, gender, diaspora, physicality, memory, class, and the family. | en_US |
dc.description.note | February 2018 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/32714 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | open access | en_US |
dc.subject | Memoir | en_US |
dc.subject | Autobiography | en_US |
dc.subject | Postmodern Autobiography | en_US |
dc.subject | Postmodernism | en_US |
dc.subject | Postmodern | en_US |
dc.subject | Abjection | en_US |
dc.subject | Lucy Grealy | en_US |
dc.subject | Suniti Namjoshi | en_US |
dc.subject | Vladimir Nabokov | en_US |
dc.subject | Robert Kroetsch | en_US |
dc.subject | Michael Ondaatje | en_US |
dc.subject | Julia Kristeva | en_US |
dc.title | Reviving the vanishing subject: the subject as abject in postmodern memoir | en_US |
dc.type | doctoral thesis | en_US |