Determination of the accuracy of semi-automatic and fully automatic 2d lateral cephalometric analysis programs
dc.contributor.author | Playfair, Nicholas Grant | |
dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Hechter, Frank (Preventive Dental Science) Ahing, Stephen (Dental Diagnosis and Surgical Sciences) | en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Wiltshire, William A. (Preventive Dental Science) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-08-19T14:44:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-19T14:44:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-08-19 | |
dc.degree.discipline | Preventive Dental Science | en_US |
dc.degree.level | Master of Science (M.Sc.) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of current semi-automatic and fully automatic 2D lateral cephalometric analysis programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 lateral cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected and grouped based their skeletal malocclusions to form 3 equal groups of 20 Class I, 20 Class II and 20 Class III. These radiographs were then analyzed via traditional hand-based analysis. The values obtained from this method of analysis were compared to 4 subsequent methods of analysis. These consisted of semi-automatic analysis using Dolphin Imaging software, semi-automatic analysis using Kodak Orthodontic Imaging software, fully automatic analysis using Kodak Orthodontic Imaging software and fully automatic analysis combined with limited landmark changes using Kodak Orthodontic Imaging software. RESULTS: ICC tests were completed to compare the gold standard hand-based analysis to the 4 subsequent methods. The values obtained from semi-automatic Dolphin and Kodak Orthodontic Imaging software were found to be comparable to hand-based analysis. Whereas, the values obtained from the fully automatic mode of Kodak Orthodontic Imaging software were not found to be comparable to hand-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Digital cephalometric programs can be used as an accurate method when performing lateral cephalometric analyses. The fully automatic mode of these programs should only be used as a support to diagnosis and not as a diagnostic tool. | en_US |
dc.description.note | October 2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/22037 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | open access | en_US |
dc.subject | analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | cephalometry | en_US |
dc.title | Determination of the accuracy of semi-automatic and fully automatic 2d lateral cephalometric analysis programs | en_US |
dc.type | master thesis | en_US |