Development and implementation of a consensus-derived synoptic operative report for Roux en Y gastric bypass surgery
| dc.contributor.author | Stogryn, Shannon Elise | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Gillman, Lawrence (Surgery) Rivard, Justin (Surgery) Francois, Jose (Family Medicine) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Vergis, Ashley (Surgery) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-12T15:23:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-01-12T15:23:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | en_US |
| dc.degree.discipline | Surgery | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Science (M.Sc.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Background Operative reports (OR) are critical documents in the medical record but are often poor quality. Synoptic reporting (SR) is a potential solution. This has never been assessed in bariatric surgery. The objective was to design and trial a SR for Roux en Y gastric bypass (RYGB), a common bariatric procedure. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on SR and narrative reporting (NR) was conducted. A Delphi group developed quality indicators (QIs) for RYGB OR based on these findings. A national needs assessment and audit was then performed and a RYGB SR was subsequently designed and prospectively trailed against NRs. Results Meta-analysis found SRs more complete and efficient than NRs. Seventy-five QIs were established and found bariatric ORs of mediocre quality. RYGB SR was more complete for all items compared to NRs (>99% vs 64%). Conclusion SR for RYGB is superior to NR and should be implemented into clinical practice across Canada. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | February 2018 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stogryn S, Park J, Hardy K, Vergis A. Development of Consensus-Derived Quality Indicators for Laparoscopic Roux en Y Gastric Bypass Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Feb;13(2):198-203 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stogryn S, Hardy K, Vergis A. Bariatric Operative Reporting: Quality Assessment and Perceptions Among Bariatric Surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Mar;13(3):429-435 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stogryn S, Hardy K, Mullan M, Park J, Andrew C, Vergis A. Synoptic Operative Reporting: Assessing the Completeness, Accuracy, Reliability, and Efficiency of Synoptic Reporting for Roux en Y Gastric Bypass. Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep 15. (Epub ahead of print) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/32820 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Surgical Endoscopy | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Bariatic Surgery | en_US |
| dc.subject | Operative Reporting | en_US |
| dc.subject | Synoptic Reporting | en_US |
| dc.subject | Quality Improvement | en_US |
| dc.title | Development and implementation of a consensus-derived synoptic operative report for Roux en Y gastric bypass surgery | en_US |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |