Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnancy: Insights from the cardiac hemodynamic imaging and remodeling in pregnancy (CHIRP) study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Ducas, Robin A
Elliott, Jason E
Melnyk, Steven F
Premecz, Sheena
daSilva, Megan
Cleverley, Kelby
Wtorek, Piotr
Mackenzie, G S
Helewa, Michael E
Jassal, Davinder S

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Abstract

					Background
				Cardiovascular disease in pregnancy is the leading cause of maternal mortality in North America. Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most widely used imaging modality for the assessment of cardiovascular function during pregnancy, little is known on the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The objective of the Cardiac Hemodynamic Imaging and Remodeling in Pregnancy (CHIRP) study was to compare TTE and CMR in the non-invasive assessment of maternal cardiac remodeling during the peripartum period.
			
			
				
					Methods
				Between 2010–2012, healthy pregnant women aged 18 to 35 years were prospectively enrolled. All women underwent TTE and CMR during the third trimester and at least 3 months postpartum (surrogate for non-pregnant state).
			
			
				
					Results
				The study population included a total of 34 women (mean age 29 ± 3 years). During the third trimester, TTE and CMR demonstrated an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume from 95 ± 11 mL to 115 ± 14 mL and 98 ± 6 mL to 125 ± 5 mL, respectively (p < 0.05). By TTE and CMR, there was also an increase in left ventricular (LV) mass during pregnancy from 111 ± 10 g to 163 ± 11 g and 121 ± 5 g to 179 ± 5 g, respectively (p < 0.05). Although there was good correlation between both imaging modalities for LV mass, stroke volume, and cardiac output, the values were consistently underestimated by TTE.
			
			
				
					Conclusion
				This CMR study provides reference values for cardiac indices during normal pregnancy and the postpartum state.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2014 Jan 03;16(1):1