The primary importance of corporate social responsibility and ethicality in corporation reputation: an empirical study

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Kent
dc.contributor.authorDyck, Bruno
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-02T13:59:00Z
dc.date.available2017-06-02T13:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-03
dc.description.abstractWe examine three assumptions commonly held in the corporate reputation literature: i) reputation ratings of owners and investors are generally representative of all stakeholders; ii) stakeholders will generally provide a higher reputation rating to firms that emphasize corporate social responsibility versus firms that do not; and iii) profitability is the primary criterion of importance to all stakeholders when rating a firm’s reputation. Using an exploratory in-class exercise our findings suggest that: i) there are significant differences among stakeholder groups in their reputation ratings; ii) firms that emphasize corporate social responsibility are not rated more highly across all stakeholder groups, and iii) for all stakeholder groups, the ethicality criterion explained more of the variance in firms’ reputation ratings than the profitability criterion.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/32257
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBusiness and Society Reviewen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectCorporate Reputation, Ethics, Stakeholders, Corporate Social Responsibility, Criteria, Profitabilityen_US
dc.titleThe primary importance of corporate social responsibility and ethicality in corporation reputation: an empirical studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BSR Reputation Walker Dyck 2014 .pdf
Size:
286.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.24 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: