Towards the development of a mixed reality haptic temporal bone surgical simulation
| dc.contributor.author | Rampersad, Vivek | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Balakrishnan, Subramaniam (Mechanical Engineering) Kinsner, Witold (Electrical and Computer Engineering) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Sepehri, Nariman (Mechanical Engineering) Unger, Bertram (Mechanical Engineering) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-12T14:21:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-12T14:21:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.degree.discipline | Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Science (M.Sc.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The temporal bone is an anatomically complex region within the skull. Current training for temporal bone surgery includes cadaveric, physical and virtual haptic simulations and apprenticeships. Cadavers are limited by low supply. Haptic devices are limited by their force and stiffness ratings and thus cannot adequately simulate rigid materials. Physical simulations excel at simulating stiff materials but do a poor job of soft tissue. The research objective was to develop a mixed reality (MR) temporal bone surgical haptic simulation. This novel concept would utilize physical models to simulate bone and haptic forces to simulate soft tissue. A surgical drill was attached to a Quanser® High Definition Haptic DeviceTM (HD2) via a clamp. An algorithm was implemented to simulate a force at the drill tip and to negate the weight of the clamp. This modified haptic system was interfaced to a temporal bone haptic simulation. Haptic chatter unique to the modified haptic system was observed and low-pass filters were used to mitigate this issue. Due to the poor positional accuracy of the HD2, MR simulation was not achieved. However, VR haptic simulation was achieved. Six expert surgeons were recruited to investigate the following questions: "What is the impact of different haptic hardware on surgical realism?" and "Would end users prefer a surgical drill over a standard haptic manipulandum?" Three cases were compared: a Phantom Omni®, a standard HD2 and a modified HD2 with attached drill. Expert surgeons rated the standard HD2 and Phantom Omni equivalently whilst preferring the modified HD2 with attached drill. Though the modified HD2 scored higher in all categories only “Acoustics” and “Overall Appreciation” displayed statistical significance. This implies that drill acoustics is critical for realism. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | February 2016 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/31029 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Haptics | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mixed reality | en_US |
| dc.subject | Temporal bone | en_US |
| dc.subject | Surgical simulation | en_US |
| dc.title | Towards the development of a mixed reality haptic temporal bone surgical simulation | en_US |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |