Rivalries for attention: insights from a realist evaluation of a postgraduate competency-based medical education implementation in Canada
| dc.contributor.author | Rachul, Christen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Collins, Benjamin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Ming-Ka | |
| dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, Ganesh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hamilton, Joanne | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-01T03:14:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-07-29 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-08-01T03:14:03Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Implementing competency-based medical education (CBME) in post-graduate medical education (PGME) is a complex process that requires multiple systemic changes in a complex system that is simultaneously engaged in multiple initiatives. These initiatives often compete for attention during the implementation of CBME and produce unintended and unanticipated consequences. Understanding the impact of this context is necessary for evaluating the effectiveness of CBME. The purpose of the study was to identify factors, such as contexts and processes, that contribute to the implementation of CBME. Methods We conducted a realist evaluation using data collected from 15 programs through focus groups with residents (2 groups, n = 16) and faculty (one group, n = 8), and semi-structured interviews with program directors (n = 18), and program administrators (n = 12) from 2018 to 2021. Data were analyzed using a template analysis based on a coding framework that was developed from a sample of transcripts, the context-mechanism-outcomes framework for realist evaluations, and the core components of CBME. Results The findings demonstrate that simultaneous initiatives in the academic health sciences system creates a key context for CBME implementation – rivalries for attention – and specifically, the introduction of curricular management systems (CMS) concurrent to, but separate from, the implementation of CBME. This context influenced participants’ participation, communication, and adaptation during CBME implementation, which led to change fatigue and unmet expectations for the collection and use of assessment data. Conclusions Rival initiatives, such as the concurrent implementation of a new CMS, can have an impact on how programs implement CBME and greatly affect the outcomes of CBME. Mitigating the effects of rivals for attention with flexibility, clear communication, and training can facilitate effective implementation of CBME. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Medical Education. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):583 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03661-8 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/36650 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Rivalries for attention: insights from a realist evaluation of a postgraduate competency-based medical education implementation in Canada | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| local.author.affiliation | Rady Faculty of Health Sciences | en_US |