Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisor Bracken, Denis(Social Work) en
dc.contributor.author Ginter, Lisa M.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-06T15:18:45Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-06T15:18:45Z
dc.date.issued 2011-04-06T15:18:45Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4442
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study was to consider to what degree each of two sexual offender programs offered by Manitoba Justice adhere to the research based practice principles of risk, need, and responsivity and to assess the degree of therapeutic alliance that is created in each group. In-person interviews were conducted with employees and past participants who are connected to each of the programs. Current participants of the two programs were asked to complete a questionnaire about therapeutic alliance. The findings indicated that neither of the programs adhere to the risk principle, both adhere to the responsivity principle, and only one adheres to the need principle. There was no difference on the clients’ perception of therapeutic alliance within the groups. Recommendations provided with regards to the sexual offender programming offered by Manitoba Justice include consistent programming, education/mentorship, utilizing a secondary risk assessment, and evaluation and research. en
dc.format.extent 709819 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject sexual en
dc.subject offender en
dc.subject probation en
dc.subject program en
dc.title A comparison of two Manitoba justice sexual offender programs en
dc.degree.discipline Social Work en
dc.contributor.examiningcommittee Bacon, Brenda(Social Work) Linden, Rick(Sociology) en
dc.degree.level Master of Social Work (M.S.W.) en
dc.description.note May 2011 en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics