• Libraries
    • Log in to:
    View Item 
    •   MSpace Home
    • University of Manitoba Researchers
    • University of Manitoba Scholarship
    • View Item
    •   MSpace Home
    • University of Manitoba Researchers
    • University of Manitoba Scholarship
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of BASE eConsult Manitoba: patient perspectives on the use of electronic consultation to improve access to specialty advice in Manitoba

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    12913_2022_Article_8913.pdf (966.1Kb)
    Date
    2023-02-09
    Author
    Singer, Alexander
    Ireland, Laurie
    Sepehri, Zahra
    Brown, Kelly
    Turner, Kevin
    Liddy, Clare
    Keely, Erin
    Oppenheimer, Luis
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background The burden of waiting to access specialist expertise may contribute to poorer health outcomes and causes distress for patients and providers. One solution to improve access to specialist care is to use innovative tools such as remote asynchronous electronic consultation (eConsult). Modeled after the Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialist Advice) eConsult service, BASE™ eConsult Manitoba was launched in 2017 to help address long waits for patients to access specialist advice. Objective We aimed to evaluate patients’ experiences after obtaining a BASE™ eConsult Manitoba service in their primary care setting. Methods Patients whose Primary Care Providers (PCPs) used BASE™ eConsult as part of their care were asked to participate and complete a telephone-based or online 29-question survey between January 2021 and October 2021. The survey questions were created in consultation with patient partners and based on questions asked in studies done in other jurisdictions. Results Of the 36 patients who chose to participate, 29 completed the entire survey (80%). Two-thirds (n = 22) agreed that eConsult has been helpful in their situation, and over 80% (n = 24) of participants agreed that eConsult was an acceptable way to access specialist care. During the visit when their PCP sent the eConsult, 7 patients were expecting to be referred to a specialist for a face-to-face consultation. Over half of all respondents (n = 15) reported that before the eConsult occurred, their PCP asked them what questions they wanted to be answered by the specialist. Almost all of these respondents’ questions were fully answered by the eConsult. All of the respondents were satisfied with the experience of receiving an eConsult. Conclusion Using eConsult is an acceptable way to improve access to specialist advice from patients’ perspectives. Consideration should be given to expanding the use of eConsult services to improve access to specialist expertise for PCPs and their patients.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08913-3
    http://hdl.handle.net/1993/37185
    Collections
    • University of Manitoba Scholarship [1981]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of MSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV