• Libraries
    • Log in to:
    View Item 
    •   MSpace Home
    • Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Practica)
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
    • View Item
    •   MSpace Home
    • Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Practica)
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Navigating the nutrition information landscape for healthcare providers of residents in long-term care homes at the end of life

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Thesis (1.203Mb)
    Date
    2022-08-24
    Author
    Pidborchynski, Haley
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: End of life (EOL) care is provided to residents in long-term care (LTC) homes and aims to support quality of life until death. EOL care does not always meet the expectations of caregivers as they often receive inconsistent and inadequate information about the resident’s care at EOL. Issues of short-staffing and lack of EOL nutritional practices in LTC have been further accentuated by COVID-19. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine 1) How healthcare providers (HCPs) perceive food and eating at the end of life for older adults in LTC in normal conditions and during a pandemic; and 2) What EOL nutrition conversations in LTC currently look like. Methods: Sixteen HCPs working in Manitoba LTC homes were recruited and interviewed [female (88%), mean age ± SD = 42 ± 10.2 years; dietitians (62.5%)]. The semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: Three themes emerged from the interviews. 1) Negotiating tensions in nutrition at EOL: tensions arise from differing expectations and the importance of nutrition of the HCPs, caregivers, and sometimes the residents. HCPs provide education to caregivers on the role of food at EOL and what is best for the comfort of the resident. 2) Bridging the nutritional divide: EOL nutrition information is provided by HCPs to caregivers mostly through in-person conversations. HCPs stated that the most appropriate time to initiate these conversations is at admission or when there is a change in the resident’s condition. 3) Challenges during COVID-19: visitor restrictions limited conversations to be over the phone and HCPs had to provide more frequent updates to bridge this gap. Due to the rapid progression of the virus, conversations about the nutritional care of COVID-19-positive residents involved more discussion of management of gastrointestinal issues and predicting health trajectory. Conclusion: HCPs in LTC navigate tensions at EOL through balancing comfort and nutritional needs of the resident, and bridge the nutritional divide by providing education to caregivers. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the way EOL nutritional conversations were carried out due to visitor restrictions and the rapid progression of the virus.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1993/36890
    Collections
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica [25522]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of MSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV