• Libraries
    • Log in to:
    View Item 
    •   MSpace Home
    • Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Practica)
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
    • View Item
    •   MSpace Home
    • Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Practica)
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Intercropping studies in organic pea production

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Bailey-Elkin_Will.pdf (2.141Mb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Bailey-Elkin, Will
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Semi-leafless field peas (Pisum sativum L.) do not compete well with weeds and synthetic herbicides are prohibited in certified organic crop production. Therefore, significant interest has been placed on the development of alternative strategies of weed management in organic field pea production. Pea intercropping has recently become popular in the Canadian Prairies as a means of suppressing weeds. However, little research has been completed on additive pea intercrops under organic management. The objectives of this research project were to evaluate different yellow pea (cv. CDC Amarillo) intercrop mixtures to examine their effect on weed suppression, grain yield and quality, plant growth, and profitability. In 2019 and 2020 three separate pea intercrop experiments were completed in Carman Manitoba, Canada, under organic management. The three experiments were separated by companion crop species. Peas were planted in both monoculture and additive intercropping designs with low, medium, or high seeding rates of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), mustard (Brassica juncea L.), or oats (Avena sativa L.). When averaged across site-years weed biomass suppression varied between the three experiments. The medium and high seeding rates reduced (P<0.05) weed biomass by 17% to 44% and resulted in a significant (P<0.05) pea yield penalty from 8% to 26%. Pea-cereal intercropping appeared to provide a greater level of weed biomass suppression compared to pea-mustard intercropping. Furthermore, pea-mustard intercrops were unstable across the three site-years suggesting that pea-mustard intercropping in organic production may result in unpredictable outcomes. In most instances, across all three experiments, pea growth and grain quality were not affected by intercropping. Intercropping did not increase net returns across a wide range of market conditions. In conclusion, while all three intercrop mixtures exhibited the ability to suppress weed biomass, substantial reductions in pea yields were observed and the contribution of the non-pea companion crop grain yield did not benefit net returns significantly.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1993/35994
    Collections
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica [25529]
    • Manitoba Heritage Theses [6064]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of MSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV