• Libraries
    • Log in to:
    View Item 
    •   MSpace Home
    • Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Practica)
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
    • View Item
    •   MSpace Home
    • Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Practica)
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Zero tillage crop production in Manitoba

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Donaghy, Zero Tillage.pdf (8.678Mb)
    Date
    1973
    Author
    Donaghy, David Ian.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The influence of three years of zero tillage on weed populations and crop response was studied at three locations in Southern Manitoba, The crops grown were wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Manitou), barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Conquest and cv. Paragon), flax (Linum usitatissimum L., cv. Noralta), and rapeseed (Brassica napus L. var. annua Koch cv. Target and cv. Turret). The crops were sown using a triple disc drill system. The weed growth at the time of seeding was controlled with 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium ion (paraquat) plus 6,7- dihydrodipyrido (1,2-a:2',1'-c) pyrazinediium ion (diquat) at 0.84 + 0.28 kg/ha, with paraquat plus (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid (2,4-D) ester at 0.84 + 1.12 kg/ha, and with paraquat plus 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile (bronoxynil) and ((4-chloro-o-tolyl) oxy) acetic acid (MCPA) at 0.28 + 0.56 kg/ha. Annual weed populations were lower under zero tillage than under conventional tillage. The species which were reduced in number were Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. (green foxtail),Avena fatua, L. (wild oats), Polygonum scabrum Moench (green smartweed), and Polygonum convolvulus L. (wild buckwheat). The perennial weeds, Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. (quack grass) and Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (Canada thistle), presented problems under zero tillage. Other herbicide treatments which resulted in good weed control were paraquat at 0.28 kg/ha applied in a spray volume of 69 l/ha, 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (dinoseb) at 4.48 and 8.97 kg/ha, and N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine (glyphosate) at 0.56 kg/ha. Paraquat at 0.28 kg/ha was more effective when applied in 69 l/ha spray volume than when applied in 138, 183, or 243 l/ha spray volume, and was more effective when applied in the evening than when applied in the morning. Dinoseb resulted in excellent weed control at the time of spraying and gave residual control of broad-leaved weeds, green foxtail, and wild oats, Wheat (cv. Neepawa), barley (cv. Conquest), and Avena sativa L. cv. Harmon (oats ) were tolerant to dinoseb at 8.97 kg/ha. Glyphosate at 0.56 kg/ha resulted in weed control equivalent to control from paraquat plus diquat at 0.84 + 0.28 kg/ha. More crop plants emerged under zero...
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3534
    Collections
    • FGS - Electronic Theses and Practica [25522]
    • Manitoba Heritage Theses [6062]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of MSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV