Sustainable Overwintering Systems for Beef Cows on the Canadian Prairies: Challenges and Solutions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2019
Authors
Donohoe, Gwendolyn
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The goal of this thesis was to provide an in-depth description of winter bale grazing (BG) for beef cows, including the impacts on animal, soil and forage productivity and the potential environmental costs and benefits. A winter trial with 60 pregnant beef cows was conducted over two, 21-day periods (P1 and P2) with the following treatments: drylot (DL), BG, and BG with supplementation (dried distillers grains with solubles; BGDG) at a rate of 8.3 kg cow-1 every three days. All treatments received low-quality (11% CP) forage ad libitum. Dry matter (DM) intake in P1 for the DL and BG systems was 13.4 and 12.2 kg cow-1 d-1 while average daily gain was 0.45 and -0.28 kg cow-1 d-1, respectively. Enteric methane emissions (L d-1 and % GEI) were greatest from the BG system in P1. Forage DM yield decreased by 68% following application of manure from the BGDG treatment compared to a control field and was attributed to smothering by waste feed. Concentrations of residual soil extractable nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) were 15 and 2.5 times greater, respectively, at the centre of bale placement areas compared to a control. Detailed grid soil sampling revealed that 40 area-weighted mean extractable N and P samples, collected in a 4:1 ratio from waste feed affected and unaffected areas of the field, were required to determine field mean nutrient status without compromising precision. A system-scale nutrient budget model was used to determine efficiency of N and P inputs in BGDG and DL systems. Surpluses were 448 and 225 kg N ha-1 and 52 and 26 kg P ha-1, and efficiency was 0.4 and -0.3% N and 8.7 and 12.1 % P for the BGDG and DL systems, respectively. This research provides scientific information regarding, DM intake, enteric methane and N and P surpluses from extensively overwintered beef cows. These studies suggest that in some production systems bale grazing may have increased enteric methane emissions and decreased nutrient utilization efficiency compared to DL systems. These results must be considered along with economic costs and benefits to more fully assess the sustainability of overwintering systems.
Description
Keywords
Bale grazing, Beef cows, Winter grazing, Enteric methane, Nutrient use efficiency, Overwintering beef cows, Nutrient balance, Soil sampling, Sustainability, Environmental indicator, Cow productivity, Forage productivity
Citation