Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisor Berkes, Fikret (Natural Resources Institute) en
dc.contributor.author Robinson, Lance W.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-20T20:50:16Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-20T20:50:16Z
dc.date.issued 2009-08-20T20:50:16Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3171
dc.description.abstract Social-ecological systems of traditional pastoralists are adapted to deal with shocks and stresses such as droughts and livestock disease that characterize their environment. However, inappropriate policies have undermined the resilience of pastoralist social-ecological systems at a time when stresses from new challenges, such as growth in the human population and global climate change are increasing. Many pastoralist groups such as the Gabra of north-central Kenya now regularly require emergency relief. There is an urgent need to take deliberate steps to rebuild the resilience of pastoralist social-ecological systems. One lever that external actors such as NGOs and government agencies have that could help them to do so relates to structures and processes of participation and decision-making. The purpose of this research, therefore, was to examine ways in which the approaches to public participation used by agencies involved in water resources management can affect the collective capacity of pastoralist institutions and communities to influence social-ecological resilience. The research revolved around a single case study: the Kenyan NGO Pastoralist Integrated Support Programme (PISP) together with the Gabra communities where PISP works. The research found that the capacity to influence resilience resides in the network of vertical and horizontal institutional linkages as much as it does in any particular organization or institution. This implies the need for a radical paradigm shift in the way that NGOs and other formal sector actors think of participation and of their role. An examination of the Gabra approach to decision-making and PISP's approach to participation point to an alternative way of thinking about participation. This alternative rationale for participation would call on formal sector actors to promote participation and inclusivity of decision-making at multiple levels of social organization through an array of interconnected processes and institutions, to foster deliberation processes that are nested across levels, and to help create and strengthen vertical institutional linkages for their beneficiary communities. These proposed strategies relate to a key contribution of this research, which is to suggest building a resilience-based theory of participation and to provide a glimpse of what such a theory might entail. en
dc.format.extent 1590106 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject pastoralists en
dc.subject resilience en
dc.subject participation en
dc.subject community-based water resources management en
dc.subject social-ecological systems en
dc.subject Gabra en
dc.subject Kenya en
dc.title Participatory development and the capacity of Gabra pastoralist communities to influence resilience en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.degree.discipline Natural Resources Management en
dc.contributor.examiningcommittee Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria (Colorado State University) King, Leslie (Vancouver Island University) Sinclair, A. John (Natural Resources Institute) Venema, Henry David (International Institute for Sustainable Development) en
dc.degree.level Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) en
dc.description.note October 2009 en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics