Nutritional and environmental impacts of livestock production systems in Canada: a food systems perspective

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2023-09-20
Authors
Gunte, Kebebe Ergano
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract

Meeting the challenge of providing a consistent supply of nutritious food for a growing global population is a significant issue facing humanity in the 21st century. Animal-sourced foods (ASF) play a vital role in global food security and nutrition, but their production is often criticized for its high resource demand and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study examined the relationship between animal production and the environmental and nutritional impacts of land use and dietary choices in Canada. Data regarding animal feed demand and land base requirements, nutrient composition, prices and GHG emissions of crop and animal-based products, human nutritional requirements, and socio-demographic factors affecting food choices were collected from various sources, including Statistics Canada, USDA, industry reports, and published literature. The research employed a combination of mixed research methods, such as multilevel mixed-effects probit regression, inverse probability weighted with regression adjustment, mathematical diet optimization techniques, and spreadsheet models for data analysis. The analysis demonstrated that Canada's total annual dry matter (DM) feed demand in 2016 was approximately 63.9 million t, requiring approximately 17.9 million ha of land. Diet optimization indicated that nutrient intake requirements of Canadian population could generally be met from the domestic food supply, except for certain fatty acids and vitamins. Omnivore, lacto-ovo, and lacto-vegetarian diets required more food to meet Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) requirements and produced more GHG emissions than vegan diets. However, completely removing animals from Canadian farming systems and transitioning to vegan diets led to increased diet costs. Based on our analysis, the exclusion of red meat from diets resulted in statistically significant differences in the intake of 14 -17 nutrients, depending on the analytical approach used. Further, the risk of calcium, energy, potassium, and vitamin D inadequacy was higher for people who did not consume red meat, while potential inadequacy for magnesium, fiber, and vitamin A was lower for those that did. Sex, education, family status, and cultural background are important determinants of dietary choice among Canadians. These findings can help scientists, policymakers, farmers, and other stakeholders make informed decisions about how to achieve food security and sustainability in a changing world.

Description
Keywords
Food Security, Animal-sourced Foods (ASF), Environmental Impacts, Nutritional Requirements, Dietary Choices, Land use shifts
Citation