Alternate routes: the dynamic of intergovernmental relations in Canada and Australia
| dc.contributor.author | Collins, Emmet | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Thomas, Paul (Political Studies) Friesen, Jean (History) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Wesley, Jared (Political Studies) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-15T16:06:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-15T16:06:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-08-15 | |
| dc.degree.discipline | Political Studies | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Arts (M.A.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This Master’s Thesis compares the dynamics of intergovernmental relations (IGR) in Canada and Australia. In particular, the study explores how two such similar countries have developed such distinct sets of intergovernmental institutions. In Australia, the Commonwealth has increasingly dominated IGR since the 1930s, a process which culminated with the creation of the Council of Australian Government, a “vertical” (Commonwealth-state) institution. In Canada, federal-provincial-territorial relations have been far less institutionalized. Instead, “horizontal” (provincial-territorial) relations have evolved slowly into the Council of the Federation, the most regularized forum for IGR in Canadian history. By examining the historical development of federalism more generally and IGR specifically, this study uncovers a mutually-reinforcing relationship between centralization and the verticality of IGR in Australia, and a corresponding bond between decentralization and horizontality in Canada. Based on original interviews with key intergovernmental officials in each country, the study attributes these relationships to a number of factors, including the presence of multi-nationalism, the strength of intrastate federalism, the nature of judicial interpretation, the structure of fiscal federalism, and the personal style of political figures. The thesis concludes that verticality in Canada and horizontality in Australia are functions of the same factors which made one decentralized and the other centralized, and that institutions of IGR are both cause and effect of the prevailing dynamic in either federation. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | October 2011 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4757 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Federalism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Intergovernmental Relations | en_US |
| dc.subject | Canadian politics | en_US |
| dc.subject | Australian Politics | en_US |
| dc.title | Alternate routes: the dynamic of intergovernmental relations in Canada and Australia | en_US |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |