Comparison of sampling strategies to monitor water quality in Prairie Watersheds

dc.contributor.authorRoss, Cody A.
dc.contributor.authorAli, Genevieve
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-18T16:33:45Z
dc.date.available2014-07-18T16:33:45Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-18
dc.description.abstractMost water-quality monitoring programs are characterized by low-frequency sampling with variable intervals (Neal et al., 2012). In Manitoba, Conservation and Water Stewardship collects water from streams and creeks approximately four times a year with the intention of capturing seasonal water-quality fluctuations. This type of sampling is however unable to capture changes in water-quality attributes that take place at short timescales. Recent research suggests that significant fluctuations in water-quality occurr across a wide range of timescales (e.g., Kirchner, 2003; Feng et al., 2004; Kirchner et al., 2004; Halliday et al., 2012). Particularly, the diffuse transfer of nutrients in watersheds, particularly phosphorus, has been shown to occur on an hourly scale (Halliday et al., 2012). Additionally, in the Prairies, both snowmelt on frozen ground and intense thunderstorms are short-lived and tend to result in hydrological responses in a matter of hours rather than days or weeks, thus challenging the representativeness of water samples collected outside of these critical hydrological events (Zhao and Gray, 1997). The general objective of this project was to compare sampling strategies for water-quality monitoring in Prairie watersheds. The comparison was guided by three specific research questions regarding: 1. Water quality parameter sensitivity • Do specific water quality parameters range in sensitivity to hydrologic processes typical of Prairie landscapes? 2. Sampling time • Does sampling time impact the hydrochemical information obtained from water-quality analysis? 3. Data representativeness • Does an increase in sampling interval length necessarily result in the reduction of data representativeness?en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Earth Observation Science (CEOS)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/23704
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subject2014en_US
dc.subjectprairieen_US
dc.subjectCatfish Creek Watersheden_US
dc.subjectsampling strategyen_US
dc.subjectwater qualityen_US
dc.titleComparison of sampling strategies to monitor water quality in Prairie Watershedsen_US
dc.typeconference posteren_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cody A Ross - CGU 2014 Poster.pdf
Size:
6.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.17 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: