Variation in beef cattle supplement intake using a precision feeding system
| dc.contributor.author | Hanson, Brandon | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | McGeough, Emma (Animal Science) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Wittenberg, Karin (Animal Science) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Morrison, Jason (Biosystems Engineering) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Ominski, Kimberly | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-27T21:36:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-27T21:36:59Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-04-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-04-02 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-04-02T22:05:28Z | en_US |
| dc.degree.discipline | Animal Science | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Science (M.Sc.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This project evaluated the supplement intake accuracy, precision and consistency of eight by-product supplements delivered to cattle via SmartFeed Pro feeder. In Trial 1, cross-bred Angus steers (n=8 hd treatment-1) were offered the following diets over three, 14-d experimental periods: 1) supplementation of ad libitum low-protein forage (5.5% CP) with grain screening pellets with and without caramel-flavoring provided at 1.0 kg hd-1 d-1 as fed, 2) supplementation of ad libitum low protein forage (5.5% CP) with processed pea screening powder (PPSP), sunflower screenings, or flax screenings provided at 0.57, 1.04, and 1.34 kg hd-1 d-1 as fed, respectively; and 3) supplementation of ad libitum low energy forage (41.4% TDN) with wheat screenings, wheat bran, or quinoa dockage at 2.6 kg hd-1 d-1 as fed. In Trial 2, cross-bred Angus heifers (n=10 hd treatment-1) were offered the following dietary treatments: 1) a low-CP (5% CP) grass hay-based supplemented with canola meal (mean 0.28 kg hd-1 d-1 as fed), and 2) a grass hay forage (9% CP) supplemented with sunflower screenings (mean 0.79 kg hd-1 d-1 as fed) over four, 21-d periods. Grain screening pellets without flavoring resulted in lower mean within and between-animal %CV compared to caramel-flavored pellets (13.7% vs 15.3% and 13.9% vs 19.8%, respectively). Steers offered PPSP had higher error, absolute error, within and between-animal %CV (-21.3%, 26.6%, 30.9%, and 31.7%, respectively) than steers offered sunflower screenings (-7.7%, 13.6%, 18.5%, 17.5%, respectively) and flax screenings (1.2%, 6.9%, 8.2%, and 8.5%). Absolute accuracy and within and between-animal %CV did not differ between wheat screenings, wheat bran, or quinoa dockage (mean 8.7%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively). In Trial 2, a lower quantity of canola meal and sunflower screenings supplementation led to higher absolute error, within-animal %CV, and between-animal %CV (mean 27.0%, 29.3%, 30% and 15.3%, 20%, 18.2%, respectively) compared to supplements delivered at >1.0 kg hd-1 d-1 in Trial 1. In conclusion, the SmartFeed Pro system can be used to deliver a variety of supplements on an individual-animal basis, however, lower quantity of feed delivered and system errors may decrease accuracy, precision, and consistency. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | May 2023 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/37300 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Precision Feeder | en_US |
| dc.subject | SmartFeed Pro | en_US |
| dc.subject | SmartFeed | en_US |
| dc.subject | Supplement Intake Variation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Feeding Behavior | en_US |
| dc.subject | Adaptation to Precision Feeder | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cattle Precision Feeding | en_US |
| dc.title | Variation in beef cattle supplement intake using a precision feeding system | en_US |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |
| local.subject.manitoba | yes | en_US |
| project.funder.identifier | ; 501100009482 | en_US |
| project.funder.name | Agricultural Greenhouse Gases program; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada | en_US |