Predicting Secondary Injury Risk Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Literature Review
Loading...
Date
2021-05-15
Authors
Sheard, Stefanie
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly ruptured knee
ligament. Surgical reconstruction offers the best prognosis for recovery by increasing stability
and decreasing complications. Unfortunately, after an athlete resumes activity, there is an
increased risk of injury to both the graft, and the contralateral ACL. Previous studies have
investigated return to sport (RTS) assessment tools’ capability to foresee secondary ACL injury,
largely providing no concrete evidence as to which tools are predictive of secondary ACL injury.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate existing RTS assessment tools’ capability of predicting
a secondary ACL injury in athletes who RTS. This study sought to identify tools that orthopedic
surgeons and physician assistants could utilize to aid clinical decision making when considering
RTS following surgical reconstruction.
Methods: This literature review searched the PubMed database from 2015-present, using search
terms related to ACL reconstruction and RTS. All abstracts were screened against inclusion
criteria. The primary outcome measured was RTS tools’ capability to predict secondary ACL
injury.
Results: Five articles met the selection criteria. Two studies concluded that passing RTS criteria
did not significantly decrease the risk of secondary ACL injury. Two studies indicated that
available literature was insufficient to confidently determine the predictive validity of RTS for
secondary ACL injury. Only one study found an association between passing RTS criteria and
reduced secondary ACL risk; functional, psychologic, and radiologic tests were identified to
have capability in predicting secondary ACL injury. This data was used to create an evidencebased
RTS battery consisting of tests, cut-off points and predictive capability of secondary ACL
injury.
Conclusion: Based on the heterogeneity of the results, there is a need for more research to
determine the best RTS battery and the associated predictive capability for secondary ACL
injury. A preliminary evidence-based RTS battery incorporating functional, psychological, and
radiological measures was proposed; large scale studies are required to validate this tool.
Description
Keywords
Secondary Injury Risk, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Knee Reinjury, ACL injury