The impact of response modality in an audiovisual Stroop task

dc.contributor.authorTomy, Stephanie
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteePassmore, Steven (Kinesiology and Recreation Management) Marotta, Jonathan (Psychology)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorGlazebrook, Cheryl (Kinesiology and Recreation Management)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T16:45:38Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T16:45:38Z
dc.date.copyright2021-06-14
dc.date.issued2021-06-03en_US
dc.date.submitted2021-06-15T01:02:42Zen_US
dc.degree.disciplineKinesiology and Recreation Managementen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractWhat we see, hear, and remember depends largely on the information we receive from our senses. Given that our attentional resources are limited, coupled with the abundance of incoming sensory information, we must learn how to focus on task-relevant information while ignoring irrelevant stimuli. Humans use multisensory integration to help combine sensory information from different modalities so that it can be processed and perceived as a single percept. It is consistently reported that multimodal stimuli are responded to more quickly and accurately as compared to unimodal stimuli. The concept of attention supports the central nervous system with this process by directing attention to specific parameters based on task instructions. To determine how competing and/or supporting sensory information are processed, movement trajectories were recorded using three-dimensional motion capture while participants completed a two-choice goal-directed reaching task in response to audiovisual Stroop stimuli, in either both a respond-visual and respond-auditory conditions. In contrast to the predictions, response modality did not influence reaction time (RT), or movement time (MT). However, auditory-neutral trials led to significantly longer RTs. Consistent with the hypotheses, the respond-visual condition led to earlier trajectory deviations, especially when the written word was congruent with the auditory stimulus. Results are discussed in light of current models of goal-directed reaching by assessing how multisensory integration and attention impact voluntary movement. Ultimately these models can help to inform the design of new technology interfaces.en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/35708
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectMultisensory integrationen_US
dc.subjectStroopen_US
dc.titleThe impact of response modality in an audiovisual Stroop tasken_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tomy_Stephanie.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: