Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorSenehi, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorFilecia, Danielle
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-20T17:10:21Z
dc.date.available2022-09-20T17:10:21Z
dc.date.copyright2022-09-20
dc.date.issued2022-09-20
dc.date.submitted2022-09-20T16:48:33Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/36918
dc.description.abstractThe 2016 election represents a culmination of decades-long shifts toward right-wing populism throughout the western world. This change crescendoed with the election of Donald Trump, a person who has never shied away from propagating hateful rhetoric, which has dangerous implications for marginalized communities. The LGBTQ community in the US has faced a series of challenges in its decades-long battle for fundamental human rights. The Stonewall riots, AIDS activism, and the current struggle for trans rights mark significant moments in this struggle. Previous examinations of the effects of the 2016 election on marginalized communities reveal its detrimental mental health outcomes. However, some studies examining the topic differ in their analysis of the length and severity of such results. Structural violence in Peace and Conflict Studies (PACS) coupled with a Marxist analysis of mental health provides a baseline for thinking about mental health in late capitalism. Literature from PACS and Queer theory offers a valuable landscape for the current study. The researcher obtained data from 19 individuals who self-identify as LGBTQ. Transcripts from the interviews are coded using grounded theory instruments. Specifically, the researcher relies on constructive grounded theory to examine the interviews. The findings fall into three inter-related categories. First, respondents highlight intra- community conflicts related to identity and belonging. Additionally, side conflicts center around bias and bigotry targeted at transgender individuals. Second, the effects of these conflicts fall into two categories- identity and structural violence. Identity manifests in participants’ struggles with mental health, such as depression and anxiety. Additionally, participants struggled with reconciling and understanding their coming out experiences. The role of structural violence appears through participants’ geographic anxiety and feelings of privilege. Third, participants respond to these challenges through community and activism. One’s community may include given/biological relations and chosen connections. Second, participants had previously engaged in activism and continue to do so in opposing the more extreme choices of the administration. The study highlights the need for further mental health interventions, preferably centered around coping tools and the LGBTQ community. Furthermore, more exploration of inter-LGBTQ conflict and the coming out experience will add rich data to the field.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLGBTQen_US
dc.subjectRight-wing populismen_US
dc.subjectLos Angeles LGBTQen_US
dc.subjectPopulism in the United Statesen_US
dc.subjectLGBTQ and Trumpen_US
dc.subjectQueeren_US
dc.subjectLGBTen_US
dc.subjectTrumpen_US
dc.subjectElection 2016en_US
dc.titleExploratory Study of Right-Wing Populism and the Los Angeles LGBTQ Communityen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.typedoctoral thesisen_US
dc.degree.disciplinePeace and Conflict Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeByrne, Sean (Peace and Conflict Studies)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeFlaherty, Maureen (Peace and Conflict Studies)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeMizzi, Robert (Education)en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeRobin Cooper (Nova Southeastern University)en_US
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)en_US
dc.description.noteOctober 2022en_US
local.subject.manitobanoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record