Measures of Relative Importance 1 for Health-Related Quality of Life

Thumbnail Image
Sajobi, Tolulope
Lix, Lisa
Clara, Ian
Walker, John
Graff, Lesley A.
Rawsthorne, Patricia
Miller, Norine
Rogala, Linda
Carr, Rachel
Bernstein, Charles N.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Quality of Life Research
PURPOSE: In health-related quality of life (HRQOL) studies, data are often collected on multiple domains for two or more groups of study participants. Quantitative measures of relative importance, which are used to rank order the domains based on their ability to discriminate between groups, are an alternative to multiple tests of significance on the group differences. This study describes relative importance measures based on logistic regression (LR) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) models. METHODS: Relative importance measures are illustrated using data from the Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Cohort Study. Study participants with self-reported active (n = 244) and inactive (n = 105) disease were compared on 12 HRQOL domains from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Questionnaire. RESULTS: All but two relative importance measures ranked the IBDQ bowel symptoms and emotional health domains as most important. CONCLUSIONS: MANOVA-based importance measures are recommended for multivariate normal data and when group covariances are equal, while LR measures are recommended for non-normal data and when the correlations among the domains are small. Relative importance measures can be used in exploratory studies to identify a small set of domains for further research.
Health Services, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Quality of life, Bernstein
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):1-11