MSpace - DSpace at UofM >
University of Manitoba Researchers (Research Publications) >
Research Publications (UofM Student, Faculty and Staff only access) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2959

Title: Derivation and comparison of SAR and frequency-wavenumber migration within a common inverse scalar wave problem formulation
Authors: Gilmore, C
Jeffrey, I
LoVetri, J
Keywords: frequency-wavenumber (F-K) migration
ground penetrating radar (GPR)
inverse wave problem
synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
Issue Date: 30-Jun-2006
Citation: 0196-2892; IEEE TRANS GEOSCI REMOT SEN, JUN 2006, vol. 44, no. 6, p.1454 to 1461.
Abstract: Two common Fourier imaging algorithms used in ground penetrating radar (GPR), synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and frequency-wavenumber (F-K) migration, are reviewed and compared from a theoretical perspective. The two algorithms, while arising from seemingly different physical models: a point-scatterer model for SAR and the exploding source model for F-K migration, result in similar imaging equations. Both algorithms are derived from an integral equation formulation of the inverse scalar wave problem, which allows a clear understanding of the approximations being made in each algorithm and allows a direct comparison. This derivation brings out the similarities of the two techniques which are hidden by the traditional formulations based on physical scattering models. The comparison shows that the approximations required to derive, each technique from the integral equation formulation of the inverse problem are nearly identical, and hence the two imaging algorithms and physical models are making similar assumptions about the solution to the inverse problem, thus clarifying why the imaging equations are so similar. Sample images of landmine-like targets buried in sand are obtained from experimental GPR data. using both algorithms.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1993/2959
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.870402
Appears in Collection(s):Research Publications (UofM Student, Faculty and Staff only access)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Gilmore_Derivation_and_comparison.pdf651.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in MSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! MSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback