Why does it take so long? Implementing electronic records programs at universities
| dc.contributor.author | Fiebelkorn, Guillermo Eduardo | |
| dc.contributor.examiningcommittee | Bak, Gregory (History) Elvins, Sarah (History) Sweeney, Shelley (Special Collections & Archives, Elizabeth Dafoe Library) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Nesmith, Thomas (History) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-05T20:22:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-04-05T20:22:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-04-05 | |
| dc.degree.discipline | History | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Arts (M.A.) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The implementation of electronic records management is a challenging task due to the resources it requires and most importantly because it requires a substantial change in the methodology to be used for electronic rather than analog records. Universities in North America have struggled with electronic records management for the last two decades because most records practitioners have neglected this methodology paradigm shift created by the arrival of electronic records. Given the great significance of universities in their societies, it is important that they manage electronic records effectively. It seems a bit odd that universities have not developed adequate responses to the challenge of managing electronic records since many are heavily funded by governments and must comply with multiple regulations that obligate them to manage their records well. Moreover, universities have been the source of much academic research into digital records issues and have access to this expertise, and familiarity with the issues. They also have a long tradition of archival programs for analog records. This thesis analyzes the causes for delayed implementation of electronic records management (eRM) best practices in certain North American universities in Canada and the United States. It concludes that the main cause is failure to adopt the guiding principles of the ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Records Management (RM) standard 15489: 2001 and the methodologies associated with it. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | May 2012 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/5265 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.rights | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | records management | en_US |
| dc.subject | university | en_US |
| dc.subject | records continuum | en_US |
| dc.subject | implementation methodology | en_US |
| dc.subject | DIRKS | en_US |
| dc.subject | North America | en_US |
| dc.subject | electronic records | en_US |
| dc.subject | best practices | en_US |
| dc.title | Why does it take so long? Implementing electronic records programs at universities | en_US |
| dc.type | master thesis | en_US |