Acceptance or Rejection of Cowbird Parasitism: Cues Used in Decision-Making by Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia)

dc.contributor.authorGuigueno, Melanie Francoise
dc.contributor.examiningcommitteeHare, James (Biological Sciences) Davoren, Gail (Biological Sciences) Walker, David (Environment and Geography)en
dc.contributor.supervisorSealy, Spencer (Biological Sciences)en
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T16:07:09Z
dc.date.available2010-04-09T16:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-09T16:07:09Z
dc.degree.disciplineBiological Sciencesen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe proximate causes triggering nest abandonment are unclear for most species, including the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petechia), which abandons nests parasitized by cowbirds (via burial or desertion). Cowbird parasitism and rejection of parasitism are costly to some hosts; therefore cues affecting their responses have important evolutionary implications. Manipulative experiments showed that experimentally adding a cowbird egg elicited similar rejection frequencies (2008: 31.8%; 2009: 26.1%) as naturally laid eggs (2008: 27.1%; 2009: 20.0%). In 2008, interaction with an egg-removing model increased the probability of abandonment and the most aggressive individuals were more likely to bury the model cowbird egg. In 2009, eggs added to nests before sunrise were rejected at a frequency (29.7%) similar to eggs added to nests after sunrise (22.9%). Warblers returning to nests after egg addition peered significantly longer at their clutch than at control nests, shuffled their bodies more frequently when on the eggs and spent more time probing eggs with their bill once settled on their parasitized clutch. Furthermore, although non-mimetic blue eggs were not abandoned significantly more frequently than cowbird eggs (blue 31.1% versus cowbird 21.4%), only blue eggs were ejected from some nests. Thus, warblers use both tactile and visual cues to detect the presence of a parasitic egg in their nest. Eggs added to nests were not rejected at a lower frequency than naturally parasitized nests, as was recorded in a previous study. It is difficult to know whether this increase in abandonment of experimental eggs is due to phenotypic plasticity, genetic changes, or other factors. Egg recognition abilities may have changed because I have shown that the warblers’ behaviour changes before versus after egg addition, whereas no changes were recorded in an earlier study. Finally, not all individuals that buried eggs for the first time in 2009 (21.4%) buried again after being re-parasitized (5.3%), when less time remained in the breeding season relative to the first parasitism event. This suggests that egg rejection and host responsiveness in warblers, and likely other avian hosts that use abandonment as a form of rejection, is affected by environmental cues which may act as genetic expressers.en
dc.description.noteMay 2010en
dc.format.extent3963359 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/3958
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsopen accessen_US
dc.subjectBrood parasitismen
dc.subjectYellow Warbleren
dc.subjectDendroica petechiaen
dc.subjectBehavioural syndromeen
dc.subjectPhenotypic plasticityen
dc.subjectGenetic changeen
dc.subjectTactileen
dc.subjectVisualen
dc.subjectEgg recognitionen
dc.titleAcceptance or Rejection of Cowbird Parasitism: Cues Used in Decision-Making by Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia)en
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
local.subject.manitobayesen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Guigueno_MastersThesis_FGS_Apr8.pdf
Size:
3.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.34 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: