|
MSpace at the University of Manitoba >
Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Dissertations) >
FGS - Electronic Theses & Dissertations (Public) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4219
|
| Title: | Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics |
| Authors: | Fynn, Mark Andrew |
| Supervisor: | Johnson, Gary (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics) |
| Examining Committee: | Brewin, Derek (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics) Connor, Laurie (Animal Science) Andersson, Hans (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) |
| Graduation Date: | October 2010 |
| Keywords: | sow group-housing economics |
| Issue Date: | 22-Sep-2010 |
| Abstract: | The objective was to devise a simulation model that could economically compare two group-housing systems for sow operations, a conventional system (CONV) that uses partial-slatted concrete flooring and an alternative system (ALT) that uses straw-covered concrete. Further, the research aimed to determine the optimal parity in which to terminally cull sows. Data were collected on 121 sows between two experimental barns for 7 parities. These data were used to estimate a production function and a culling function. These functions, along with economic data, were used to create an economic simulation model. Production was best predicted by parity and lactation feed intake, and culling was best predicted by parity, weight, and gait score. Optimal terminal culling occurred after parity 6 in ALT and after parity 7 in CONV. Overall, ALT was more profitable than CONV. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4219 |
| Appears in Collections: | FGS - Electronic Theses & Dissertations (Public)
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|